Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34101003›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2021

An update on surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bianca Aibuedefe, Sarah M Kling, Matthew M Philp, Howard M Ross, Juan Lucas Poggio

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bianca AibuedefeTemple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, 3500 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA. tuh24999@temple.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2516-3565
Sarah M KlingDepartment of General Surgery, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, 3401 N. Broad St., Zone C, 4th floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.
Matthew M PhilpDepartment of General Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, 3401 N. Broad St., Zone C, 4th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.
Howard M RossDepartment of General Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, 3401 N. Broad St., Zone C, 4th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.
Juan Lucas PoggioDepartment of General Surgery, Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, 3401 N. Broad St., Zone C, 4th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.
Temple University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPathologic hemorrhoids are common among adults age 45-65. Hemorrhoids are characterized as internal or external, and grades 1-4 based on severity. The type and grade dictate treatment, with surgical treatment reserved for grades 3/4. The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of various surgical treatments.

methodsA systematic review was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials that compare surgical treatments for grade 3/4 hemorrhoids. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was done using NetMetaXL and WinBUGS.

resultsA total of 26 studies with 3137 participants and 14 surgical treatments for grade 3/4 hemorrhoids were included. Pain was less in patients with techniques such as laser (OR 0.34, CI 0.01-6.51), infrared photocoagulation (OR 0.38, CI 0.02-5.61), and stapling (OR 0.48, CI 0.19-1.25), compared to open and closed hemorrhoidectomies. There was less recurrence with Starion (OR 0.01, CI 0.00-0.46) and harmonic scalpel (OR 0.00, CI 0.00-0.49), compared to infrared photocoagulation and transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization. Fewer postoperative clinical complications were seen with infrared photocoagulation (OR 0.04, CI 0.00-2.54) and LigaSure (OR 0.16, CI 0.03-0.79), compared to suture ligation and open hemorrhoidectomy. With Doppler-guided (OR 0.26, CI 0.05-1.51) and stapled (OR 0.36, CI 0.15-0.84) techniques, patients return to work earlier when compared to open hemorrhoidectomy and laser.

conclusionThere are multiple favorable techniques without a clear "gold standard" based on current literature. Open discussion should be had between patients and physicians to guide individualized care.

Indexed as

HemorrhoidectomyHemorrhoidsAdultAgedBayes TheoremHumansLigationMiddle AgedSurgical StaplingTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID34101003
OpenAlexW3170220568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.