ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2021
Malignant prediction in paragangliomas: analysis for clinical risk factors.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metastatic Disease in Phaeochromocytomas and Paragangliomas in Various Genotypes-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Analysis of the clinical characteristics of bone metastases after pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma surgery.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Correctly identifying the cells of origin is essential for tailoring treatment and understanding the emergence of cancer stem cells and late metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Metastatic sporadic paraganglioma with EWSR1::CREM gene fusion: A unique molecular profile that expands the phenotypic diversity of the molecular landscape of the EWSR1::CREM gene fusion positive tumors.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2023Article
- Metastatic paraganglioma.BMJ case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionParagangliomas are infrequent neuroendocrine tumours whose only criterion for malignancy is presence of metastases; thus, all paragangliomas show malignant potential. Actually, different risk factors have been analyzed to predict metastases but they remain unclear. PURPOSE: To analyze clinical, histological, and genetic factors to predict the occurrence of metastasis. PATIENTS AND
methodA multicentre retrospective observational analysis was performed between January 1990 and July 2019. Patients diagnosed with paraganglioma were selected. Clinical, histological, and genetic features were analyzed for the prediction of malignancy.
resultsA total of 83 patients diagnosed with paraganglioma were included, of which nine (10.8%) had malignant paraganglioma. Tumour size was greater in malignant tumours than in benign (6 cm vs. 4 cm, respectively; p = 0.027). The most frequent location of malignancy was the thorax-abdomen-pelvis area observed in six cases (p = 0.024). No differences were observed in histological differentiation, age, symptoms, and catecholaminergic production. The most frequent genetic mutation was SDHD followed by SDHB but no differences were observed between benign and malignant tumours. In the univariate analysis for predictive factors for malignancy, location, tumour size, and histological differentiation showed statistical significance (p = 0.025, p = 0.014, and p = 0.046, respectively); however, they were not confirmed as predictive factors for malignancy in the multivariate analysis.
conclusionIn this study, no risk factors for malignancy have been established; therefore, we recommend follow-up of all patients diagnosed with paraganglioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.