Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34100979›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

Inorganic pellets containing microsclerotia of Metarhizium anisopliae: a new technological platform for the biological control of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.

Thainá Rodrigues Santos, Flávia Regina Santos da Paixão, Alaine Maria Lopes Catão, Elen Regozino Muniz, Cárita Souza Ribeiro-Silva, Stephania Fleury Taveira, Christian Luz, Gabriel Moura Mascarin, Éverton Kort Kamp Fernandes, Ricardo Neves Marreto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Production ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Production of Microsclerotia byJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. A Review of CommercialInsects · 2022
    Review
  11. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thainá Rodrigues SantosFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Samambaia, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil.
Flávia Regina Santos da PaixãoInstituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Samambaia, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil.
Alaine Maria Lopes CatãoInstituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Samambaia, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil.
Elen Regozino MunizInstituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Samambaia, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil.
Cárita Souza Ribeiro-SilvaInstituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Samambaia, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil.
Stephania Fleury TaveiraFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Samambaia, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil.
Christian LuzInstituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Samambaia, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil.
Gabriel Moura MascarinLaboratório de Microbiologia Ambiental, Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Jaguariúna, SP, 13918-110, Brazil.
Éverton Kort Kamp FernandesInstituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Samambaia, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil. evertonkort@ufg.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7062-3295
Ricardo Neves MarretoFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Avenida Esperança s/n, Campus Samambaia, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil. ricardomarreto@ufg.br.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 431928/2016-9Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico PQ 306319/2018-7Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico PQ 308850/2015-7Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico PQ 311672/2016-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was sought to devise pellets containing inorganic materials and microsclerotia of Metarhizium anisopliae strain IP 119 for biological control of Rhipicephalus microplus, the most economically important tick in Brazilian cattle industry. In addition, we evaluated the storage stability of the pellets, their tolerance to ultraviolet radiation (UV-B), and efficacy against ticks under laboratory conditions. Fungal microsclerotia were produced by liquid culture fermentation and mixed with pre-selected inorganic matrices: vermiculite powder, diatomaceous earth, and colloidal silicon dioxide (78:20:2, w/w/w). The microsclerotial pellets were then prepared by a two-stage process involving extrusion and spheronization. Pellet size averaged 525.53 ± 7.74 μm, with a sphericity index of 0.72 ± 0.01, while biomass constituents did not affect the wet mass properties. Conidial production from microsclerotial pellets upon rehydration ranged from 1.85 × 10

Indexed as

MetarhiziumRhipicephalusAnimalsBrazilFemalePest Control, BiologicalUltraviolet RaysBioefficacyCattle tickEntomopathogenic fungiMicrosclerotial formulationPelletsUV-B

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.