Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34100974›Full record

ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2022

Scale of pregnant women's assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice related to urinary incontinence.

Gabriela Lima Ribeiro, Mariana Luisa Veras Firmiano, Camila Teixeira Moreira Vasconcelos, Dayana Maia Saboia, Maria Helena Baena de Moraes Lopes, José Ananias Vasconcelos Neto

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriela Lima RibeiroFederal University of Ceará, Alexandre Baraúna Street 1115, Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Mariana Luisa Veras FirmianoHospital Complex of the Federal University of Ceará, Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares-EBSERH, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Camila Teixeira Moreira VasconcelosFederal University of Ceará, Alexandre Baraúna Street 1115, Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. camilavasconcelos@ufc.br.ORCID 0000-0003-4578-4657
Dayana Maia SaboiaHospital Complex of the Federal University of Ceará, Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares-EBSERH, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Maria Helena Baena de Moraes LopesCampinas State University, Campinas, Brazil.
José Ananias Vasconcelos NetoFederal University of Ceará, Alexandre Baraúna Street 1115, Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisUrinary incontinence (UI) is prevalent during pregnancy and negatively affects quality of life. Despite this, few women seek professional assistance during prenatal care. Assessing the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of pregnant women related to UI can contribute to the development and improvement of the quality of interventions performed during this period. For this, it is essential to apply targeted and valid instruments for this population. Thus, the present study aimed to construct and validate the content of a scale to evaluate the KAP of pregnant women related to UI.

methodsExtensive literature review guided the operationalization of the instrument's initial items. Ten experts were selected for the theoretical analysis of the items, which was carried out using the Delphi technique, and the analysis of semantic adequacy proceeded from the application of the scale to 30 pregnant women. The data were analyzed using the content validity coefficient and kappa coefficient.

resultsThe proposed Scale of Pregnant Women's Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice related to UI was approved by consensus by the experts, with a mean Cohen's kappa of 0.84 (p < 0.01), comprising 23 items.

conclusionsThe results of the study confirm that the presented scale can be used as a valid tool to assess the KAP of pregnant women related to UI.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeUrinary IncontinenceFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudes and practiceHealth knowledgePregnant womenUrinary incontinenceValidation studies

Identifiers

PMID34100974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.