Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34100949›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Contemporary clinical decision support standards using Health Level Seven International Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources.

Howard R Strasberg, Bryn Rhodes, Guilherme Del Fiol, Robert A Jenders, Peter J Haug, Kensaku Kawamoto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Using CDS Hooks to increase SMART on FHIR app utilization: a cluster-randomized trial.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Usability Evaluation of the RevisedChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. A scoping review of rule-based clinical decision support malfunctions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Could an artificial intelligence approach to prior authorization be more human?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  20. Clinical Trial Design Innovations for Precision Medicine in Asthma.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Howard R StrasbergClinical Effectiveness, Wolters Kluwer Health, San Diego, California, USA.
Bryn RhodesDynamic Content Group, Orem, Utah, USA.
Guilherme Del FiolDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-6799
Robert A JendersDepartment of Internal Medicine and Center for Biomedical Informatics, Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Peter J HaugMedical Informatics, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Kensaku KawamotoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4282-9338

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
Sustaining Faculty Development & Community EngagementS21MD000103 · NIMHD · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED &SCI · PI CARLISLE, DAVID M · 2001 to 2015
$73.9M
Workshop for Junior Biostatisticians in Health ResearchU54MD007598 · NIMHD · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED & SCI · PI Piwen Wang · 2012 to 2026
$60.0M
Leveraging an electronic medical record infrastructure to identify primary care patients eligible for genetic testing for hereditary cancer and evaluate novel cancer genetics service delivery modelsU01CA232826 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KAPHINGST, KIMBERLY A, SIGIREDDI, MEENAKSHI · 2018 to 2022
$5.5M
Scalable Clinical Decision Support for Individualized Cancer Risk ManagementU24CA204800 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DEL FIOL, GUILHERME, KAWAMOTO, KENSAKU · 2017 to 2021
$3.7M
Scalable decision support and shared decision making for lung cancer screeningR18HS026198 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KAWAMOTO, KENSAKU · 2019 to 2021
$1.2M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS026198NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NCI NIH HHS U01 CA232826NCI NIH HHS U24 CA204800NIMHD NIH HHS S21 MD000103NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo facilitate the development of standards-based clinical decision support (CDS) systems, we review the current set of CDS standards that are based on Health Level Seven International Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR). Widespread adoption of these standards may help reduce healthcare variability, improve healthcare quality, and improve patient safety. TARGET AUDIENCE: This tutorial is designed for the broad informatics community, some of whom may be unfamiliar with the current, FHIR-based CDS standards. SCOPE: This tutorial covers the following standards: Arden Syntax (using FHIR as the data model), Clinical Quality Language, FHIR Clinical Reasoning, SMART on FHIR, and CDS Hooks. Detailed descriptions and selected examples are provided.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalHealth Level SevenDelivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsHumansElectronic Health RecordsHealth Information InteroperabilityHealth Level Sevenmedical informaticssoftware

Identifiers

PMID34100949
PMCPMC8324242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.