Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34100765›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Using the Computer-based Health Evaluation System (CHES) to Support Self-management of Symptoms and Functional Health: Evaluation of Hematological Patient Use of a Web-Based Patient Portal.

Jens Lehmann, Petra Buhl, Johannes M Giesinger, Lisa M Wintner, Monika Sztankay, Lucia Neppl, Wolfgang Willenbacher, Roman Weger, Walpurga Weyrer, Gerhard Rumpold and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electronic patient-reported outcome platforms used in hematological cancers: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. [Application and Effect of Patient Portal System in the Remote Management of Chronic Diseases for Older Adults With Coronary Heart Disease].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Adherence to daily electronic symptom screening in pediatric cancer: associations with time, location and pain.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jens Lehmann *University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4670-7517
Petra BuhlOncotyrol - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0064-4220
Johannes M GiesingerUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2744-5950
Lisa M WintnerUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0690-4708
Monika SztankayUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7938-1250
Lucia NepplUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4989-4992
Wolfgang WillenbacherOncotyrol - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7702-1721
Roman WegerOncotyrol - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3036-940X
Walpurga WeyrerComprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6575-1946
Gerhard RumpoldUniversity Clinic of Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6037-793X
Bernhard HolznerUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3389-3621
Universität Innsbruck · ATInnsbruck Medical University · ATUniversity Hospital Innsbruck · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient portals offer the possibility to assess patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) remotely, and first evidence has demonstrated their potential benefits.

objectiveIn this study, we evaluated patient use of a web-based patient portal that provides patient information and allows online completion of PROMs. A particular focus was on patient motivation for (not) using the portal. The portal was developed to supplement routine monitoring at the Department of Internal Medicine V in Innsbruck.

methodsWe included patients with multiple myeloma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia who were already participating in routine monitoring at the hospital for use of the patient portal. Patients were introduced to the portal and asked to complete questionnaires prior to their next hospital visits. We used system access logs and 3 consecutive semistructured interviews to analyze patient use and evaluation of the portal.

resultsBetween July 2017 and August 2020, we approached 122 patients for participation in the study, of whom 83.6% (102/122) consented to use the patient portal. Patients were on average 60 (SD 10.4) years old. Of patients providing data at all study time points, 37% (26/71) consistently used the portal prior to their hospital visits. The main reason for not completing PROMs was forgetting to do so in between visits (25/84, 29%). During an average session, patients viewed 5.3 different pages and spent 9.4 minutes logged on to the portal. Feedback from interviews was largely positive with no patients reporting difficulties navigating the survey and 50% of patients valuing the self-management tools provided in the portal. Regarding the portal content, patients were interested in reviewing their own results and reported high satisfaction with the dynamic self-management advice, also reflected in the high number of clicks on those pages.

conclusionsPatient portals can contribute to patient empowerment by offering sought-after information and self-management advice. In our study, the majority of our patients were open to using the portal. The low number of technical complaints and average time spent in the portal demonstrate the feasibility of our patient portal. While initial interest was high, long-term use was considerably lower and identified as the main area for improvement. In a next step, we will improve several aspects of the patient portal (eg, including a reminder to visit the portal before the next appointment and closer PROM symptom monitoring via an onconurse).

Indexed as

Patient PortalsSelf-ManagementChildComputersHumansInternetPatient Reported Outcome Measureschronic lymphocytic leukemiaeHealthmHealthmonitoringmultiple myelomapatient portalspatient-reported outcome measuresquality of life

Identifiers

PMID34100765
PMCPMC8262597
OpenAlexW3168256172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.