Article in Radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Yannick BliesenerFrom the Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave, EEB 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2564 (Y.B., K.S.N.); GE Healthcare, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L., R.F.); Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.A., K.S.N.); and Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neuroscience, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.F.).ORCID 0000-0001-5436-1918
R Marc LebelFrom the Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave, EEB 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2564 (Y.B., K.S.N.); GE Healthcare, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L., R.F.); Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.A., K.S.N.); and Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neuroscience, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.F.).ORCID 0000-0002-7526-9974
Jay AcharyaFrom the Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave, EEB 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2564 (Y.B., K.S.N.); GE Healthcare, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L., R.F.); Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.A., K.S.N.); and Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neuroscience, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.F.).ORCID 0000-0003-0873-0836
Richard FrayneFrom the Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave, EEB 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2564 (Y.B., K.S.N.); GE Healthcare, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L., R.F.); Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.A., K.S.N.); and Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neuroscience, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.F.).
Krishna S NayakFrom the Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave, EEB 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2564 (Y.B., K.S.N.); GE Healthcare, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L.); Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Canada (R.M.L., R.F.); Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.A., K.S.N.); and Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neuroscience, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (R.F.).ORCID 0000-0001-5735-3550
University of Southern California · USUniversity of Calgary · CA
Funding
Area B: Precise DCE-MRI Assessment of Brain TumorsR33CA225400 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI NAYAK, KRISHNA S · 2017 to 2017
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R33 CA225400
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Background Advances in sub-Nyquist-sampled dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI enable monitoring of brain tumors with millimeter resolution and whole-brain coverage. Such undersampled quantitative methods need careful characterization regarding achievable test-retest reproducibility. Purpose To demonstrate a fully automated high-resolution whole-brain DCE MRI pipeline with 30-fold sparse undersampling and estimate its reproducibility on the basis of reference regions of stable tissue types during multiple posttreatment time points by using longitudinal clinical images of high-grade glioma. Materials and Methods Two methods for sub-Nyquist-sampled DCE MRI were extended with automatic estimation of vascular input functions. Continuously acquired three-dimensional k-space data with ramped-up flip angles were partitioned to yield high-resolution, whole-brain tracer kinetic parameter maps with matched precontrast-agent T1 and M
Indexed as
Brain NeoplasmsContrast MediaFemaleGliomaHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingReproducibility of ResultsContrast Media
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Pseudo Test-Retest Evaluation of Millimeter-Resolution Whole-Brain Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Patients with High-Grade Glioma. · full record | OpenQuestion