ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2022
What is the optimum number of follicular flushes in mono-follicular in-vitro fertilization cycles in a poor responder population?
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Systematic Follicular Flushing on Egg Retrieval and Embryo Quality in IVF-ICSI Cycles: A Controlled Study?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAssessment of the optimal number of follicular flushes on retrieval rate and quality of oocytes in mono-follicular in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. MATERIAL AND
methodsA retrospective analysis of 246 oocyte pick-up procedures in mono-follicular IVF cycles of 226 poor responder women was performed. The primary endpoint was oocyte retrieval rate in the initial aspirate versus subsequent flushing episodes. The secondary endpoints were oocyte maturity, fertilization rates and embryo cleavage.
resultsThe procedure was successful in 187 cycles (76%), of which 160 metaphase-II oocytes were retrieved. Retrieval rates were similar for natural and modified natural cycles (p=0.595). The initial aspirate provided 54% of the total yield and the rest was obtained from up to four episodes of flushing. Follicular flushing increased oocyte recovery rate from 41.1% to 76%. None of the oocytes retrieved after three flushes fertilized. Oocyte maturity, fertilization and embryo cleavage rates were comparable for oocytes from the initial aspirate and one or two episodes of flushing. Oocytes obtained after the third flushing episode developed into poor quality embryos.
conclusionFlushing confers a benefit for oocyte recover rates in mono-follicular IVF cycles in poor responder women. However, more than three attempts at flushing were not associated with good outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.