ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2022
Can the application of a temporary uterine tourniquet during an abdominal myomectomy reduce bleeding?
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Efficiency of a Uterine Isthmus Tourniquet in Minimizing Blood Loss during a Myomectomy-A Prospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Trial
- The Hangman's Tourniquet: A Safe and Practical Approach for Reducing Blood Loss During Uterine Myomectomy.Cureus · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Uterine fibroids are common, benign uterine tumours. The three most common surgical treatment approaches for uterine fibroids are laparoscopic, robotic and abdominal myomectomies. Bleeding is a risk with all three approaches. The present study compared post-operative and pregnancy outcomes in patients with bilateral uterine artery occlusion who underwent an abdominal myomectomy, with or without a temporary uterine tourniquet. Material and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with intra-mural fibroids (≥5 cm) who underwent an abdominal myomectomy. The patients were divided into two groups according to the use or non-use of a temporary uterine tourniquet. Post-operative and pregnancy outcomes in the tourniquet use and non-use groups were compared. The association of the number of uterine fibroids removed (≤3 vs >3) with laboratory parameters was also evaluated. Results: A total of 84 patients were included, divided into use (n=36) and non-use (n=48) of the temporary tourniquet. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups with >3 myomas removed and with a uterine tourniquet applied and not applied in terms of reduction in hemoglobin and hematocrit, transfusion amounts, operation times and lengths of hospitalization in favour of the uterine tourniquet use group (p=0.019, p=0.023, p=0.012, p=0.044 and p=0.036, respectively). Bilateral uterine arterial occlusion using a temporary uterine tourniquet had no negative effects on pregnancy outcomes. Conclusion: A temporary uterine tourniquet may be an effective method for reducing the amount of perioperative bleeding in patients with multiple, large-sized myomas located close to vascular structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.