Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34100574›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2022

The efficacy, acceptability and continuation of postpartum, post-abortive progestin-only pill: a pioneering prospective multicentric study from Turkey

Berna Dilbaz, Mehmet Bülbül, Serdar Dilbaz, Nafiye Yılmaz, Sema Sanisoğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Berna DilbazClinic of Reproductive Endocrinology and Family Planning, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women’s Health Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-1137-8650
Mehmet BülbülDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Adıyaman University Faculty of Medicine, Adıyaman, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-5695-2586
Serdar DilbazClinic of Reproductive Endocrinology and Family Planning, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women’s Health Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-9542-2799
Nafiye YılmazClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-4041-297X
Sema SanisoğluGeneral Directorate of Reproductive Health and Woman’s Health, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-0755-9627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, side-effects and continuation rate of the desogestrel-progestin-only-pill (POP) in postpartum and post-abortive Turkish women and its relation with breast-feeding. Material and Methods: In this prospective multicentric study women who delivered (or had surgical abortion) and wanted to receive POP for contraception were recruited to the study. The follow-up visits were scheduled at the third, sixth and ninth months. Results: Overall A total of 7,468 women (66.5% postpartum, 33.5% post-abortive) participated in the study. The number of women who attended follow-up visits in relation to the previous visit at the third, sixth and ninth months was 944/7,468 (12.6%), 406/944 (43%) and 121/406 (29.8%) respectively. The incidence of breastfeeding at all visits was between 54.8% and 68.4%. Out of the 7,468 women recruited only 6% continued with the method at the end of the ninth month. There was a statistically significant increase in hemoglobin level at the third month compared to initial values. Oligomenorrhea, spotting and headache were the three leading side-effects. There was no pregnancy among the patients who were followed up. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that POP was an effective postpartum and post-abortive contraceptive method that had no negative impact on breast-feeding. A change in bleeding patterns was the most common side-effect. However, the possible causes of low contraceptive maintenance rates need to be investigated.

Indexed as

Breast-feedingcontraceptionpost-abortivepostpartumprogestin-only pill

Identifiers

PMID34100574
PMCPMC9743347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.