Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34100573›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2021

Identification and characterization of endometrial carcinoma with tumor markers HE4 and CA125 in serum and endometrial tissue samples

Tatiana Cuesta-Guardiola, Alicia Quiros Carretero, Javier Martinez-Martinez, Yolanda Cuñarro-López, Augusto Pereira-Sánchez, Alfonso Fernández-Corona, Juan Antonio de Leon-Luis

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tatiana Cuesta-GuardiolaDepartment Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of Leon, Leon, SpainORCID 0000-0002-1060-9050
Alicia Quiros CarreteroDepartment of Mathematics, University of Leon, Leon, SpainORCID 0000-0001-5259-4793
Javier Martinez-MartinezDepartment of Pathology, Hospital of Leon, Leon, SpainORCID 0000-0003-4589-2885
Yolanda Cuñarro-LópezDepartment Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, SpainORCID 0000-0002-8190-8680
Augusto Pereira-SánchezDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, SpainORCID 0000-0003-2534-1007
Alfonso Fernández-CoronaDepartment Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of Leon, Leon, SpainORCID 0000-0002-4178-7597
Juan Antonio de Leon-LuisDepartment Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, SpainORCID 0000-0002-6320-2668
Hospital de León · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESUniversidad de León · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Diagnosis of endometrial cancer (EC) is made by biopsy sampling with pathological analysis, but it is extremely important to make an accurate diagnosis in order to plan the specific treatment. We hypothesized that human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in endometrial tissue and in serum could be beneficial for a more precise diagnosis. Material and Methods: This prospective study compared patients with EC against non- EC, matched through several variables. The inclusion criteria were: females older than 18 years who accepted to participate; who had never undergone surgery for other oncological pathologies (ovarian, colon, cervical carcinoma or uterine sarcoma); none of them had received preoperative chemo- or radio-therapy; and no participant had any severe renal or liver pathology. All had pre-surgery blood sampling and then underwent hysterectomy. Histopathological assessment of endometrial samples was made by a pathologist who compared normal histopathological staining with HE4-antibody staining. Results: In total there were 34 cases and 35 controls recruited. There was poor correlation between tissue HE4 in patients with and without carcinoma. However, serum HE4 was significant for the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma (median EC: 123.1 U, median NE: 64.67 U, p=0.002), although the carbohydrate antigen 125 level was not significant (p=0.208). Conclusion: The findings concerning the utility of HE4 contrast with earlier reports. However, the conclusions for serum measurements are positive and suggest that the tumor marker HE4 seems to be able to diagnose EC.

Indexed as

CA125diagnosisendometrial cancerHE4tissue

Identifiers

PMID34100573
PMCPMC8420749
OpenAlexW3198074398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.