Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34100559›Full record

SynthesisCancer medicine2021

Vitamin D supplementation for children with cancer: A systematic review and consensus recommendations.

Jenneke E van Atteveld, Iris E Verhagen, Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Hanneke M van Santen, Inge M van der Sluis, Natascia Di Iorgi, Jill H Simmons, Leanne M Ward, Sebastian J C M M Neggers

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The evolution of nutritional care in children and young people with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a narrative review.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bone Health Issues in the Pediatric Oncology Patient.Seminars in oncology nursing · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jenneke E van AtteveldPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4436-0089
Iris E VerhagenPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marry M van den Heuvel-EibrinkPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hanneke M van SantenPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Inge M van der SluisPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Natascia Di IorgiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Genova, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, GE, Italy.
Jill H SimmonsDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Leanne M WardDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sebastian J C M M NeggersPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Princess Máxima Center · NLErasmus MC · NLIstituto Giannina Gaslini · ITUniversity of Ottawa · CAVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevalent vitamin D deficiency (VDD) and low bone mineral density (BMD) have led to vitamin D supplementation for children with cancer, regardless vitamin D status. However, it remains unsettled whether this enhances bone strength. We sought to address this issue by carrying out a systematic review of the literature.

methodsWe conducted a literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Studies including children up to 5 years after cancer therapy were assessed for the association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels and BMD Z-scores or fractures, and the effect of vitamin D supplementation on BMD or fractures. Evidence quality was assessed using the GRADE methodology.

resultsNineteen studies (16 observational and 3 interventional, mainly involving children with hematologic malignancies) were included. One study which analyzed 25OHD as a threshold variable (≤10 ng/ml) found a significant association between 25OHD levels and BMD Z-scores, while 25OHD as a continuous variable was not significantly associated with BMD Z-scores in 14 observational studies. We found neither a significant association between lower 25OHD levels and fractures (2 studies), nor between vitamin D (and calcium) supplementation and BMD or fracture frequency (3 studies) (very low quality evidence).

conclusionThere is a lack of evidence for an effect of vitamin D (and calcium) supplementation on BMD or fractures in children with cancer. Further research is needed; until then, we recommend dietary vitamin D/calcium intake in keeping with standard national guidelines, and periodic 25OHD monitoring to detect levels <20 ng/ml. Vitamin D/calcium supplementation is recommended in children with low levels, to maintain levels ≥20 ng/ml year-long.

Indexed as

Bone DensityHematologic NeoplasmsNeoplasmsAdolescentCalcium, DietaryCancer SurvivorsChildChild, PreschoolFractures, BoneHumansObservational Studies as TopicPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyVitamins25-hydroxyvitamin DCalcium, DietaryVitamin DVitaminsacute lymphoblastic leukemiabone mineral densitychildhood cancerfracturesvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID34100559
PMCPMC8267124
OpenAlexW3171362706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.