Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34100361›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2021

Factors associated with the development of re-tear following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A retrospective comparative study.

Erdal Uzun, Abdulhamit Mısır, Turan Bilge Kızkapan, Mustafa Özçamdallı, Hazım Sekban, Ahmet Güney

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Erdal UzunDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Erciyes University, School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey.
Abdulhamit MısırDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Health Sciences University, Gaziosmanpasa Taksim Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Turan Bilge KızkapanClinic of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Bursa Çekirge State Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.
Mustafa ÖzçamdallıDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ahi Evran University, School of Medicine, Kırşehir, Turkey.
Hazım SekbanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Health Sciences University, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.
Ahmet GüneyDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Erciyes University, School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey.
Erciyes University · TRAhi Evran University · TRBursa Technical University · TRKayseri Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors for the development of re-tear following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair (aRCR).

methodsThis retrospective clinical study included 196 consecutive aRCRs with a minimum 3-year follow-up. Pre- and postoperative clinical and functional outcomes were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), the University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale (UCLA), the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and the Douleur Neuropathique (DN4) questzionnaire. The Goutallier staging of fatty infiltration, Occupational Ratio (OR), the Acromiohumeral Interval (AHI), Acromioclavicular Joint (ACJ) arthritis, acromion type, Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA), and tangent sign (tan- sign) were evaluated as radiological parameters. Different subgroup parameters were evaluated after dividing the patients into re-tear (-) and re-tear (+) groups, according to clinical and radiological outcomes as well as patient and intraoperative characteristics.

resultsThe mean follow-up period was 72.0 ± 15.8 months. The mean age at the time of surgery was 58.4 ± 8.9 years. A significant improvement was found in clinical and functional scores in the re-tear (-) group (P < 0.001 for all). However, the retear (+) group had poorer outcome scores than the re-tear (-) group. Twenty patients (10.2%) had re-tear at the last follow-up. There was a significant difference between groups regarding pre-and postoperative clinical scores, with worse scores in the retear (+) group (P < 0.001 for all). Also, pre-and postoperative pseudoparalysis (P = 0.001 for both), acromioclavicular joint arthritis (ACJ) (P = 0.001), intraoperative rotator cuff wear (P = 0.007) or stiffness (P = 0.025), a longer time period between symptom onset and surgery (P = 0.031), larger tear size (P = 0.010), preoperative shoulder stiffness (P = 0.001), higher duration of postoperative analgesia use (P < 0.001), higher degrees of preoperative Occupational Ratio (OR) (P < 0.001), and higher degrees of fatty degeneration (P < 0.001) were found to be associated with re- tear development.

conclusionSurgeons should consider the preoperative degree of fatty degeneration, clinical and functional scores, presence of ACJ arthritis, intraoperative tendon quality, tear size and chronicity as well as postoperative prolong analgesic requirement, and development of pseudoparalysis as factors regarding re-tear development risk following aRCR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyPostoperative ComplicationsRotator Cuff InjuriesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk AdjustmentRotator CuffTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID34100361
PMCPMC10566352
OpenAlexW3171346958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.