ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2021
Preferred auditory temporal processing regimes and auditory-motor synchronization.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Linking spontaneous speech synchronization and cognitive abilities: evidence from a syllable-timed language.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Rhythmic skills mediate the link between music training and cognition via attention and phonological processing.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Effects of speech periodicity and speech rate on auditory-motor coupling during speech comprehension.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Interindividual differences in auditory processing moderate the effect of auditory-motor coupling on paired-associate learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Moving rhythmically can facilitate naturalistic speech perception in a noisy environment.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Not primed to agree? Short or no effect of rhythmic priming on typical adults processing number agreement.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Concurrent processing of the prosodic hierarchy is supported by cortical entrainment and phase-amplitude coupling.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Speech Prosody Serves Temporal Prediction of Language via Contextual Entrainment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Auditory-motor synchronization and perception suggest partially distinct time scales in speech and music.Communications psychology · 2024Article
- Replication of population-level differences in auditory-motor synchronization ability in a Norwegian-speaking population.Communications psychology · 2023Article
- Auditory-motor synchronization varies among individuals and is critically shaped by acoustic features.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Explaining flexible continuous speech comprehension from individual motor rhythms.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Studying rhythm processing in speech through the lens of auditory-motor synchronization.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Speech-to-Speech Synchronization protocol to classify human participants as high or low auditory-motor synchronizers.STAR protocols · 2022Article
- The Relationship Between Auditory-Motor Integration, Interoceptive Awareness, and Self-Reported Stuttering Severity.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2022Article
- Musical Sophistication and Speech Auditory-Motor Coupling: Easy Tests for Quick Answers.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decoding the rich temporal dynamics of complex sounds such as speech is constrained by the underlying neuronal-processing mechanisms. Oscillatory theories suggest the existence of one optimal perceptual performance regime at auditory stimulation rates in the delta to theta range (< 10 Hz), but reduced performance in the alpha range (10-14 Hz) is controversial. Additionally, the widely discussed motor system contribution to timing remains unclear. We measured rate discrimination thresholds between 4 and 15 Hz, and auditory-motor coupling strength was estimated through a behavioral auditory-motor synchronization task. In a Bayesian model comparison, high auditory-motor synchronizers showed a larger range of constant optimal temporal judgments than low synchronizers, with performance decreasing in the alpha range. This evidence for optimal processing in the theta range is consistent with preferred oscillatory regimes in auditory cortex that compartmentalize stimulus encoding and processing. The findings suggest, remarkably, that increased auditory-motor synchronization might extend such an optimal range towards faster rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.