Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34100169›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2021

Tumor grade estımatıon of clear cell and papıllary renal cell carcınomas usıng contrast-enhanced MDCT and FSE T2 weıghted MR ımagıng: radıology-pathology correlatıon.

Ahmet Mesrur Halefoglu, Ayse Aysim Ozagari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Radiomics in Lung Metastases: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Immunotherapy Assessment: A New Paradigm for Radiologists.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmet Mesrur HalefogluSisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Birlik sok. Parksaray ap. No:17/4, Levent, 34340, Istanbul, Turkey. halefoglu@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2054-3550
Ayse Aysim OzagariDepartment of Radiology and Pathology, 34371, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2343-1236
Memorial Sisli Hospital · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiscrimination of low grade (grade 1-2) renal tumors from high grade (grade 3-4) ones carries crucial importance in terms of the management of these patients and also in the decision-making of appropriate treatment strategies. Our aim was to investigate whether contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and T2 weighted fast spin echo (FSE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could play a specific role in the discrimination of low grade versus high grade tumors in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) patients.

methodsIn this study, we retrospectively evaluated 66 RCC patients based on histopathologic findings who had underwent either partial or total nephrectomies. Our cohort consisted of 52 ccRCC and 14 pRCC patients, of whom 50 were male (%76) and 16 were female (%24). Among the 52 ccRCC patients, 18 had both cortico-medullary phase contrast-enhanced CT and MRI, 15 had only cortico-medullary phase CT and 19 had only MRI examination. In the pRCC group, 8 patients had both cortico-medullary phase contrast-enhanced CT and MRI, 3 had only cortico-medullary phase CT and 3 had only MRI. We both calculated mean tumor attenuation values on cortico-medullary phase MDCT images as HU (hounsfield unit) and also tumor mean signal intensity values on FSE T2 weighted MR images, using both region of interest and whole lesion measurements including normal renal cortex. The obtained values were compared with the grading results of the ccRCC and pRCC tumors according to the WHO/International Society of Urological Pathology grading system.

resultsA significant positive correlation was found between the mean attenuation values of both tumor subtypes on cortico-medullary phase contrast-enhanced CT and their grades (p < 0.001). High grade tumors exhibited higher mean attenuation values (74.3 ± 22.3 HU) than the low grade tumors (55.2 ± 23.7 HU) in both subtypes. However, a statistically significant correlation was not found between the mean signal intensity values of the two tumor subtypes on FSE T2 weighted MR images and their grades (p > 0.05). Low grade tumors had a mean signal intensity value of 408.9 ± 44.6, while high grade tumors showed a value of 382.1 ± 44.2. The analysis of the ccRCC group patients, yielded a statistically significant correlation between the mean signal intensity values on T2 weighted images and tumor grading (p < 0.001). Low grade (grade 1-2) ccRCC patients exhibited higher mean signal intensity values (475.7 ± 51.3), as compared to those of high grade (grade 3-4) (418.5 ± 45.7) tumors. On the other hand, analysis of the pRCC group patients revealed that there was a significant correlation between the mean attenuation values of tumors on cortico-medullary phase contrast-enhanced CT and their grades (p < 0.001). High grade papillary subtype tumors (54.2 ± 25.2) showed higher mean attenuation values than the low grade (35.5 ± 18.8) ones.

conclusionsContrast-enhanced MDCT and T2 weighted FSE MRI can play a considerable role in the discrimination of low grade versus high grade tumors of both subtype RCC patients. Thus, these non-invasive evaluation techniques may have positive impact on the determination of the management and treatment strategies of these patients.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, PapillaryCarcinoma, Renal CellContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansKidneyKidney NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyNeoplasm GradingRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaClear cell renal cell carcinomaKidneyMagnetic resonance imagingMultidetector computed tomographyPapillary renal cell carcinomaWHO/ISUP grade

Identifiers

PMID34100169
OpenAlexW3166605011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.