SynthesisClinical oral investigations2021
Clinical and esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placement compared to alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Three-arm Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Transmucosal Augmentation Techniques in Immediate Implant Placement
PROMs in Implant Dentistry: Development of a Dental Implant Standard Set
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of implant dentistry · 2022Pooled it
- Thread Depth Effects on Stability and Positional Accuracy in Guided Immediate Implants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2026Trial
- Guided immediate implant with and without using a mixture of autogenous and xeno bone grafts in the dental esthetic zone. A randomized clinical trial.BMC research notes · 2023Trial
- Implant Placement and Immediate Provisionalization After Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction in the Aesthetic Zone Using a Digital Workflow: A 1-Year Prospective Case Series Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Article
- Effect of Framework Material and Thermal Aging on Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Gingiva-Colored Composite Resins.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- CBCT-Based Anthropometric Evaluation of Edentulous Alveolar Crest Lengths.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Aesthetic Clinical Case for Immediate Implant Therapy for Maxillary Central Incisor.Case reports in dentistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of immediate implant placement (IIP) compared to implants placed after alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in terms of clinical, esthetic, and patient-reported outcomes.
methodsA manual and electronic search (National Library of Medicine) was performed for controlled clinical trials, with at least 12 months of follow-up. Primary outcome variable was implant survival and secondary outcomes were marginal bone level (MBL) (change), pink esthetic score (PES), mid-facial mucosal level (change), papilla index score, complications, and patient-reported outcomes.
resultsA total of 10 publications were included (7 randomized clinical trials and 3 controlled clinical trials). The results from the meta-analyses showed that survival rate was significantly lower in the IIP group compared to ARP group [RR = 0.33; 95% CI (0.14; 0.78); p = 0.01]. No significant differences between the two groups were observed regarding radiographic MBL, PES scores, or mid-facial mucosal level (p > 0.05).
conclusionThe results from this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that IIP had lower survival rates and similar esthetic results when compared to ARP. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians should weigh the benefits and disadvantages of each intervention to select the optimal timing of implant placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34100157What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.