ReviewDer Nervenarzt2021
[Border areas of thrombectomy].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical thrombectomy in centenarians for the treatment of acute stroke: Report of 4 patients and review of the literature.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Radiation Exposure in Interventional Stroke Treatment : Analysis of the German Neurointerventional Database (DeGIR/DGNR) from 2019 to 2021.Clinical neuroradiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the standard procedure in the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to occlusion of a large proximal cerebral artery of the anterior circulation. Nevertheless, according to the current guidelines large patient collectives are still excluded from this highly effective treatment method. Therefore, this article gives an overview of possible extensions of the indications for treatment with MT. For example, patients in the extended time window with distal occlusions, with large infarct cores and also for very old (90+ years) or young (0-17 years) patients. Furthermore, we discuss recent developments in the interventional treatment of stroke, such as new triage concepts or the question whether an additional intravenous thrombolysis is necessary in patients with MT. We conclude with our own estimations for the discussed indications for treatment based on our clinical experience and the current literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.