Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34100008›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. Healthy longevity2021

Effect of competing mortality risks on predictive performance of the QRISK3 cardiovascular risk prediction tool in older people and those with comorbidity: external validation population cohort study.

Shona Livingstone, Daniel R Morales, Peter T Donnan, Katherine Payne, Alexander J Thompson, Ji-Hee Youn, Bruce Guthrie

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. Healthy longevity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The kidney failure risk equation in people with CKD and multimorbidity: the effect of competing mortality risks.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Older Adults.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Shona LivingstoneDivision of Population Health and Genomics, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Daniel R MoralesDivision of Population Health and Genomics, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Peter T DonnanDivision of Population Health and Genomics, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Katherine PayneDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Alexander J ThompsonDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ji-Hee YounDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Bruce GuthrieUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Genomics (United Kingdom) · GBLivingstone College · USManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 214588/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is guided by risk-prediction tools, but these rarely account for the risk of dying from other conditions (ie, competing mortality risk). In England and Wales, the recommended risk-prediction tool is QRISK2, and a new version (QRISK3) has been derived and internally validated. We aimed to externally validate QRISK3 and to assess the effects of competing mortality risk on its predictive performance.

methodsFor this retrospective population cohort study, we used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. We included patients aged 25-84 years with no previous history of CVD or statin treatment who were permanently registered with a primary care practice, had up-to-standard data for at least 1 year, and had linkage to Hospital Episode Statistics discharge and Office of National Statistics mortality data. We compared the QRISK3-predicted 10-year CVD risk with the observed 10-year risk in the whole population and in important subgroups of age and multimorbidity. QRISK3 discrimination and calibration were examined with and without accounting for competing risks.

findingsOur study population included 1 484 597 women with 42 451 incident CVD events (4·9 cases per 1000 person-years of follow-up, 95% CI 4·89-4·99), and 1 420 176 men with 53 066 incident CVD events (6·7 cases per 1000 person-years, 6·66-6·78), with median follow-up of 5·0 years (IQR 1·9-9·2). Non-CVD death rose markedly with age (0·4% of women and 0·5% of men aged 25-44 years had a non-CVD death

interpretationQRISK3 performed well at the whole population level when ignoring competing mortality risk. The tool performed considerably less well in important subgroups, including older people and people with multimorbidity, and less well again after accounting for competing mortality risk.

fundingNational Institute for Health Research.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesAgedCohort StudiesComorbidityFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34100008
PMCPMC8175241
OpenAlexW3171844041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.