Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34099954›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedics

Re-excision after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcoma: A systematic review and metanalysis. The rationale of systematic re-excision.

Federico Sacchetti, Andac Celasun Alsina, Riccardo Morganti, Matteo Innocenti, Lorenzo Andreani, Francesco Muratori, Guido Scoccianti, Francesca Totti, Domenico Andrea Campanacci, Rodolfo Capanna

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Systematic Review of the Orthoplastic Approach in Adult Lower Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Flap Reconstruction.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Unplanned Sarcoma Excisions: Understanding How They Happen.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Federico SacchettiDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy.
Andac Celasun AlsinaDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Riccardo MorgantiDepartment of Statistics for Clinical Study, University Hospital of Cisanello, Pisa, Italy.
Matteo InnocentiDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo AndreaniDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy.
Francesco MuratoriDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Guido ScocciantiDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Francesca TottiDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Domenico Andrea CampanacciDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Rodolfo CapannaDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITEge University · TROspedale Cisanello · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS) referral centre many patients have already had an incomplete tumour resection. In the majority of specimen, tumoral residual is detected and linked to a worsen prognosis. Systematic surgical re-resection of the scar tissue area is often performed. Some authors suggested to postpone re-resections until a clinically evident local recurrence is detected. A searching strategy was applied to Pubmed-Central and Ovid Medline. Odds ratio (OR) for local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (MTS) or overall survival (OS) were calculated comparing patients who had tumour residual to people who hadn't. OR of local recurrences, distant metastasis and OS were calculated in planned vs unplanned-excisions groups. OR to develop a metastasis and OS after a local recurrences were calculated. Residual tumour led to an OR for LR of 3,56, OR of MTS was 3,42; OR of decreased OS was 3,42. Having a LR lead to a OR of 1,55 for MTS and to a OR of decreased OS of 2,32. Patients who underwent a re-excision compared to planned surgery did not have an increased OR of LR and had an OR to develop a MTS of 0,56. Our data confirm that there is a strong correlation between local recurrences, distant relapses and overall survival. Although there is a selection bias; this analysis highlights the optimal oncological outcome in patients who underwent re-resection. The rationale for systematic re-resection after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas is very strong and this treatment remains the gold standard of care in these patients.

Indexed as

Re-ExcisionsRe-resectionsSarcomasUnplanned excision

Identifiers

PMID34099954
PMCPMC8165293
OpenAlexW3163250881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.