ArticleCommunications biology2021
Monkey V1 epidural field potentials provide detailed information about stimulus location, size, shape, and color.
Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain signal recordings with epidural microarrays constitute a low-invasive approach for recording distributed neuronal signals. Epidural field potentials (EFPs) may serve as a safe and highly beneficial signal source for a variety of research questions arising from both basic and applied neuroscience. A wider use of these signals, however, is constrained by a lack of data on their specific information content. Here, we make use of the high spatial resolution and the columnar organization of macaque primary visual cortex (V1) to investigate whether and to what extent EFP signals preserve information about various visual stimulus features. Two monkeys were presented with different feature combinations of location, size, shape, and color, yielding a total of 375 stimulus conditions. Visual features were chosen to access different spatial levels of functional organization. We found that, besides being highly specific for locational information, EFPs were significantly modulated by small differences in size, shape, and color, allowing for high stimulus classification rates even at the single-trial level. The results support the notion that EFPs constitute a low-invasive, highly beneficial signal source for longer-term recordings for medical and basic research by showing that they convey detailed and reliable information about constituent features of activating stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.