Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34099695›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Quantitative single-cell proteomics as a tool to characterize cellular hierarchies.

Erwin M Schoof, Benjamin Furtwängler, Nil Üresin, Nicolas Rapin, Simonas Savickas, Coline Gentil, Eric Lechman, Ulrich Auf dem Keller, John E Dick, Bo T Porse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 210 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
210citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

210 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Protein-Ratio Rheostats: Integrating Stoichiometry, Abundance, and Binding Affinity in Cellular Function.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Proteogenomics in human populations.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

150 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Erwin M Schoof *The Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. erws@dtu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3117-7832
Benjamin Furtwängler *The Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5884-3380
Nil ÜresinThe Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nicolas RapinThe Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Simonas SavickasDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Coline GentilThe Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eric LechmanPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8874-2874
Ulrich Auf dem KellerDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
John E DickPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9527-8317
Bo T PorseThe Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. bo.porse@finsenlab.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6043-0844

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale single-cell analyses are of fundamental importance in order to capture biological heterogeneity within complex cell systems, but have largely been limited to RNA-based technologies. Here we present a comprehensive benchmarked experimental and computational workflow, which establishes global single-cell mass spectrometry-based proteomics as a tool for large-scale single-cell analyses. By exploiting a primary leukemia model system, we demonstrate both through pre-enrichment of cell populations and through a non-enriched unbiased approach that our workflow enables the exploration of cellular heterogeneity within this aberrant developmental hierarchy. Our approach is capable of consistently quantifying ~1000 proteins per cell across thousands of individual cells using limited instrument time. Furthermore, we develop a computational workflow (SCeptre) that effectively normalizes the data, integrates available FACS data and facilitates downstream analysis. The approach presented here lays a foundation for implementing global single-cell proteomics studies across the world.

Indexed as

HumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMass SpectrometryNeoplastic Stem CellsProteomeProteomicsRNASingle-Cell AnalysisWorkflowProteomeRNA

Identifiers

PMID34099695
PMCPMC8185083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.