Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34099680›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Selection on heritable social network positions is context-dependent in Drosophila melanogaster.

Eric Wesley Wice, Julia Barbara Saltz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ageing effects of social environments in 'non-social' insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolutionary feedbacks forProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. TransgenicCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Identifying the social context of single- and mixed-species group formation in large African herbivores.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Indirect genetic effects for social network structure inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Using Flies to Understand Social Networks.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric Wesley WiceDepartment of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA. eric.wesley.wice@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5406-0314
Julia Barbara SaltzDepartment of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0645-173X
Rice University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social group structure is highly variable and can be important for nearly every aspect of behavior and its fitness consequences. Group structure can be modeled using social network analysis, but we know little about the evolutionary factors shaping and maintaining variation in how individuals are embedded within their networks (i.e., network position). While network position is a pervasive target of selection, it remains unclear whether network position is heritable and can respond to selection. Furthermore, it is unclear how environmental factors interact with genotypic effects on network positions, or how environmental factors shape selection on heritable network structure. Here we show multiple measures of social network position are heritable, using replicate genotypes and replicate social groups of Drosophila melanogaster flies. Our results indicate genotypic differences in network position are largely robust to changes in the environment flies experience, though some measures of network position do vary across environments. We also show selection on multiple network position metrics depends on the environmental context they are expressed in, laying the groundwork for better understanding how spatio-temporal variation in selection contributes to the evolution of variable social group structure.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationSelection, GeneticSocial BehaviorAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterEnvironmentGene-Environment InteractionGenetic FitnessGenotypeInheritance Patterns

Identifiers

PMID34099680
PMCPMC8185000
OpenAlexW3171426336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.