Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34099656›Full record

ReviewNature communications2021

Towards an engineering theory of evolution.

Simeon D Castle, Claire S Grierson, Thomas E Gorochowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Why cellular computations challenge our design principles.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  11. The design and engineering of synthetic genomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Bioengineering hybrid artificial life.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025
    Review
  15. Construction of a syntrophicSynthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simeon D CastleSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6409-6142
Claire S GriersonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4000-0975
Thomas E GorochowskiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. thomas.gorochowski@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1702-786X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L01386X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological technologies are fundamentally unlike any other because biology evolves. Bioengineering therefore requires novel design methodologies with evolution at their core. Knowledge about evolution is currently applied to the design of biosystems ad hoc. Unless we have an engineering theory of evolution, we will neither be able to meet evolution's potential as an engineering tool, nor understand or limit its unintended consequences for our biological designs. Here, we propose the evotype as a helpful concept for engineering the evolutionary potential of biosystems, or other self-adaptive technologies, potentially beyond the realm of biology.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBioengineeringBiotechnologyPhenotypeSynthetic Biology

Identifiers

PMID34099656
PMCPMC8185075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.