ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021
Meeting the unmet needs of clinicians from AI systems showcased for cardiology with deep-learning-based ECG analysis.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07163767 (Acute Myocardial Infarction Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence Applied to Electrocardiogram Images), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Acute Myocardial Infarction Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence Applied to Electrocardiogram Images
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Practical Lessons on 12-Lead ECG Classification: Meta-Analysis of Methods From PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2020.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Pooled it
- Closed-Loop AI Systems for Arrhythmia Management: Toward Predictive, Personalized, and Safe Cardiac Care.Clinical cardiology · 2026Review
- Selective classification with machine learning uncertainty estimates improves ACS prediction: a retrospective study in the prehospital setting.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- False Positive Supraventricular Tachycardia During Exercise Stress Test.Clinical medicine & research · 2025Article
- Review
- Clinically meaningful interpretability of an AI model for ECG classification.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Machine Learning in the Management of Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Decorrelative network architecture for robust electrocardiogram classification.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict myocardial blood flow and clinical outcomes from patients' electrocardiograms.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence, explainability, and the scientific method: A proof-of-concept study on novel retinal biomarker discovery.PNAS nexus · 2023Article
- Machine learning for ECG diagnosis and risk stratification of occlusion myocardial infarction.Nature medicine · 2023Observational
- Artificial intelligence to enhance clinical value across the spectrum of cardiovascular healthcare.European heart journal · 2023Article
- Machine Learning for the ECG Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Occlusion Myocardial Infarction at First Medical Contact.Research square · 2023Article
- Patient-level explainable machine learning to predict major adverse cardiovascular events from SPECT MPI and CCTA imaging.PloS one · 2023Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning Techniques in ECG-Based Heart Disease Classification: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- Estimating critical values from electrocardiogram using a deep ordinal convolutional neural network.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Methods on Electrocardiogram Data: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Review
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Modeling in Healthcare.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite their great promise, artificial intelligence (AI) systems have yet to become ubiquitous in the daily practice of medicine largely due to several crucial unmet needs of healthcare practitioners. These include lack of explanations in clinically meaningful terms, handling the presence of unknown medical conditions, and transparency regarding the system's limitations, both in terms of statistical performance as well as recognizing situations for which the system's predictions are irrelevant. We articulate these unmet clinical needs as machine-learning (ML) problems and systematically address them with cutting-edge ML techniques. We focus on electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis as an example domain in which AI has great potential and tackle two challenging tasks: the detection of a heterogeneous mix of known and unknown arrhythmias from ECG and the identification of underlying cardio-pathology from segments annotated as normal sinus rhythm recorded in patients with an intermittent arrhythmia. We validate our methods by simulating a screening for arrhythmias in a large-scale population while adhering to statistical significance requirements. Specifically, our system 1) visualizes the relative importance of each part of an ECG segment for the final model decision; 2) upholds specified statistical constraints on its out-of-sample performance and provides uncertainty estimation for its predictions; 3) handles inputs containing unknown rhythm types; and 4) handles data from unseen patients while also flagging cases in which the model's outputs are not usable for a specific patient. This work represents a significant step toward overcoming the limitations currently impeding the integration of AI into clinical practice in cardiology and medicine in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.