Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34099538›Full record

ReviewRMD open2021

Treatment journey in rheumatoid arthritis with biosimilars: from better access to good disease control through cost savings and prevention of nocebo effects.

Josef S Smolen, Roberto Caporali, Thomas Doerner, Bruno Fautrel, Fabrizio Benedetti, Burkhard Pieper, Minjun Jang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RMD open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Switching from One Biosimilar to Another Biosimilar of the Same Reference Biologic: A Systematic Review of Studies.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Biosimilars for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Riding the 2023 Wave [Podcast].Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2023
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Josef S SmolenDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria josef.smolen@meduniwien.ac.at.
Roberto CaporaliDivision of Clinical Rheumatology, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO Institute, Milano, Italy.
Thomas DoernerDepartment of Medicine and Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6478-7725
Bruno FautrelDepartment of Rheumatology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8845-4274
Fabrizio BenedettiNeuroscience Department, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy.
Burkhard PieperBiogen International GmbH, Baar, Switzerland.
Minjun JangSamsung Bioepis, Incheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0224-2017

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are of critical importance to halt the progression of the disease. Optimal use of advanced imaging techniques or biomarkers may facilitate early diagnosis of RA. Even though many disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are available for RA treatment, biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) offer expanding therapeutic options and good outcomes in patients with RA who do not have a sufficient response to conventional synthetic DMARDs. However, high costs of bDMARDs have limited patient access to optimised disease management and increased the cost burden for healthcare systems. The advent of biosimilars led to significant cost savings driven by price competition among the reference products, which could be beneficial for healthcare systems. Healthcare provider (HCP)-patient communication and informed shared decision-making are crucial to prevent the occurrence of a nocebo effect, which results from negative perceptions that patients may have and could lead to less effective outcomes. Research has demonstrated that effective communication between HCPs and patients utilising positive framing can improve acceptance by patients to be initiated on or switched to a biosimilar and can help to integrate biosimilars into routine clinical practice to maximise benefits for patients with RA.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsCost SavingsHumansNocebo EffectAntirheumatic AgentsBiosimilar Pharmaceuticalsarthritisautoimmune diseasesbiological therapybiosimilar pharmaceuticalsrheumatoidtumor necrosis factor inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34099538
PMCPMC8186742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.