Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34099497›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2022

Understanding decisions about antibiotic prescribing in ICU: an application of the Necessity Concerns Framework.

Alyssa M Pandolfo, Robert Horne, Yogini Jani, Tom W Reader, Natalie Bidad, David Brealey, Virve I Enne, David M Livermore, Vanya Gant, Stephen J Brett and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05975671 (Reducing Empiric VAncomycin Use in Pediatric Suspected Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05975671 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Reducing Empiric VAncomycin Use in Pediatric Suspected Sepsis (REVAMP-Sepsis)

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaRan2023 to 2026Enrolled52,500ConditionsSepsis, Sepsis Mrsa, Sepsis Bacteremia, Antimicrobial - Induced NephropathyArmsMultifaceted de-implementation strategy to reduce vancomycin overuse
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Ethics of Antibiotic Course Duration: Shorter is Better.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Antibiotic use: psychological factors influencing perceptions and behavior of physicians and patients].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alyssa M PandolfoCentre for Behavioural Medicine, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0455-496X
Robert HorneCentre for Behavioural Medicine, University College London, London, UK r.horne@ucl.ac.uk.
Yogini JaniUCLH-UCL Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Tom W ReaderDepartment of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Natalie BidadCentre for Behavioural Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
David BrealeyDivision of Critical Care, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Virve I EnneDivision of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK.
David M LivermoreNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Vanya GantDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Stephen J BrettDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
INHALE WP2 Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotics are extensively prescribed in intensive care units (ICUs), yet little is known about how antibiotic-related decisions are made in this setting. We explored how beliefs, perceptions and contextual factors influenced ICU clinicians' antibiotic prescribing.

methodsWe conducted 4 focus groups and 34 semistructured interviews with clinicians involved in antibiotic prescribing in four English ICUs. Focus groups explored factors influencing prescribing, whereas interviews examined decision-making processes using two clinical vignettes. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, applying the Necessity Concerns Framework.

resultsClinicians' antibiotic decisions were influenced by their judgement of the necessity for prescribing/not prescribing, relative to their concerns about potential adverse consequences. Antibiotic necessity perceptions were strongly influenced by beliefs that antibiotics would protect patients from deterioration and themselves from the ethical and legal consequences of undertreatment. Clinicians also reported concerns about prescribing antibiotics. These generally centred on antimicrobial resistance; however, protecting the individual patient was prioritised over these societal concerns. Few participants identified antibiotic toxicity concerns as a key influencer. Clinical uncertainty often complicated balancing antibiotic necessity against concerns. Decisions to start or continue antibiotics often represented 'erring on the side of caution' as a protective response in uncertainty. This approach was reinforced by previous experiences of negative consequences ('being burnt') which motivated prescribing 'just in case' of an infection. Prescribing decisions were also context-dependent, exemplified by a lower perceived threshold to prescribe antibiotics out-of-hours, input from external team members and local prescribing norms.

conclusionEfforts to improve antibiotic stewardship should consider clinicians' desire to protect with a prescription. Rapid molecular microbiology, with appropriate communication, may diminish clinicians' fears of not prescribing or of using narrower-spectrum antibiotics.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsClinical Decision-MakingAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansIntensive Care UnitsPractice Patterns, Physicians'UncertaintyAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic managementcritical caredecision makingqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID34099497
PMCPMC8899486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.