Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34099069›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2021

Development and evaluation of a parent advisory group to inform a research program for knowledge translation in child health.

Lisa Hartling, Sarah A Elliott, Kelli Buckreus, Julie Leung, Shannon D Scott

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06005337 (Supporting Parents to Choose Wisely), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06005337 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Supporting Parents to Choose Wisely: A Multi-Method Study to Increase Knowledge and Manage Expectations for Common Acute Childhood Conditions

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled174ConditionsCommon Cold, Pharyngitis, Acute Otitis Media, Acute AsthmaArmsBlogshots 1-3, Blogshots 4-6
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Establishing priorities in child health: Giving parents and youth a voice.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. 'It's quite a balancing act': A qualitative study of parents' experiences and information needs related to the COVID-19 pandemic.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Co-building a training programme to facilitate patient, family and community partnership on research grants: A patient-oriented research project.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa HartlingDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, 4-472 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405-87 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada. lisa.hartling@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8341-3991
Sarah A ElliottDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, 4-472 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405-87 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Kelli BuckreusFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Julie LeungPediatric Parent Advisory Group, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Shannon D ScottFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to a growing movement to involve patients and community stakeholders in health research, we established a parent advisory group in 2016. The group meets regularly to act as advisors and partners for our research program. The purpose of this paper is to describe our experiences establishing the group, and results from parent evaluations.

methodsWe contacted 191 organizations to recruit parents and caregivers of children who wanted to contribute to child health research. Our initial goal was to recruit 8 to 10 parents who would meet regularly (approximately 8 times per year). We conducted an online baseline survey of members after the first two meetings to understand motivations for participating and early experiences. Sixteen months later we conducted another online survey to identify what was going well and areas for improvement.

resultsTwelve parents initially joined the group. The baseline survey (n = 9 complete) identified motivations for participation: wanting a patient/family voice in health research; personal experience accessing health system for child's care; wanting to improve healthcare communications. Concerns about participation included: having sufficient time to attend meetings; whether contributions would be worthwhile; and uncertainty about how the group's input would be used in practice. Parents identified aspects that were working well: opportunity to provide constructive feedback; diversity among parents involved; well-run and organized meetings (agenda and materials sent prior to meeting, skilled facilitation, adequate time for discussion). Items parents identified as not working well were: fluctuating attendance; not knowing others in the group; challenges if attending remotely. At follow-up, there were seven active members. The follow-up survey (n = 5 complete) identified positive feedback related to group dynamics (e.g., collegial, everyone participates) and organization of meetings. Suggestions for improvement included increasing membership, regular attendance, and providing adequate information/context to allow meaningful input.

conclusionsOur experience establishing a parent advisory group and evaluation of the group by parent members have yielded tremendous insights around involving parents and patient proxies in health research. The parent advisory group is a dynamic entity requiring ongoing communication between researchers and members. Effective means of evaluating engagement is essential to ensure it is meaningful. Dedicated time, funding and resources are required for success.

Indexed as

Advisory groupChild healthEvaluationKnowledge mobilizationKnowledge translationParentsPatient engagementPatient-oriented research

Identifiers

PMID34099069
PMCPMC8186233
OpenAlexW3172774431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.