Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34099065›Full record

Trial reportMilitary Medical Research2021

Bioelectrical impedance analysis-guided fluid management promotes primary fascial closure after open abdomen: a randomized controlled trial.

Kai Wang, Shi-Long Sun, Xin-Yu Wang, Cheng-Nan Chu, Ze-Hua Duan, Chao Yang, Bao-Chen Liu, Wei-Wei Ding, Wei-Qin Li, Jie-Shou Li

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Military Medical Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07142083 (Comparison of the Effects of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis-Guided Versus Conventional Fluid Resuscitation Strategies on 28-Day Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients After Major Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07142083 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effects of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis-Guided Versus Conventional Fluid Resuscitation Strategies on 28-Day Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients After Major Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorOndokuz Mayıs UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsFluid and Electrolyte Imbalance, AnesthesiaArmsBioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BCM), Conventional Fluid Management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kai WangDivision of Trauma and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Shi-Long SunDivision of Trauma and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Xin-Yu WangDivision of Trauma and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Cheng-Nan ChuDivision of Trauma and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Ze-Hua DuanDivision of Trauma and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Chao YangDivision of Trauma and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Bao-Chen LiuDivision of Trauma and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Wei-Wei Ding *Division of Trauma and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China. dingwei_nju@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5026-689X
Wei-Qin LiDivision of Trauma and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Jie-Shou Li *Division of Trauma and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China. njlijieshou@126.com.
Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluid overload (FO) after resuscitation is frequent and contributes to adverse outcomes among postinjury open abdomen (OA) patients. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a promising tool for monitoring fluid status and FO. Therefore, we sought to investigate the efficacy of BIA-directed fluid resuscitation among OA patients.

methodsA pragmatic, prospective, randomized, observer-blind, single-center trial was performed for all trauma patients requiring OA between January 2013 and December 2017 to a national referral center. A total of 140 postinjury OA patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a BIA-directed fluid resuscitation (BIA) protocol that included fluid administration with monitoring of hemodynamic parameters and different degrees of interventions to achieve a negative fluid balance targeting the hydration level (HL) measured by BIA or a traditional fluid resuscitation (TRD) in which clinicians determined the fluid resuscitation regimen according to traditional parameters during 30 days of ICU management. The primary outcome was the 30-day primary fascial closure (PFC) rate. The secondary outcomes included the time to PFC, postoperative 7-day cumulative fluid balance (CFB) and adverse events within 30 days after OA. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were utilized for PFC after OA. A generalized linear regression model for the time to PFC and CFB was built.

resultsA total of 134 patients completed the trial (BIA, n = 66; TRD, n = 68). The BIA patients were significantly more likely to achieve PFC than the TRD patients (83.33% vs. 55.88%, P < 0.001). In the BIA group, the time to PFC occurred earlier than that of the TRD group by an average of 3.66 days (P < 0.001). Additionally, the BIA group showed a lower postoperative 7-day CFB by an average of 6632.80 ml (P < 0.001) and fewer complications.

conclusionAmong postinjury OA patients in the ICU, the use of BIA-guided fluid resuscitation resulted in a higher PFC rate and fewer severe complications than the traditional fluid resuscitation strategy.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceElectric ImpedanceFasciaFemaleFluid TherapyHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpen Abdomen TechniquesProspective StudiesWater-Electrolyte BalanceWounds and InjuriesBioelectrical impedance analysisFluid overloadFluid resuscitationOpen abdomenPrimary fascial closureTrauma

Identifiers

PMID34099065
PMCPMC8180439
OpenAlexW3170943940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.