Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34099062›Full record

ArticleBMC biomedical engineering2021

3D Printed frames to enable reuse and improve the fit of N95 and KN95 respirators.

Malia McAvoy, Ai-Tram N Bui, Christopher Hansen, Deborah Plana, Jordan T Said, Zizi Yu, Helen Yang, Jacob Freake, Christopher Van, David Krikorian and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biomedical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Effectiveness of a 3D-printed mask fitter in an Ophthalmology setting during COVID-19.Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Masks for COVID-19.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  8. Review of the Effect of Continuous Use and Limited Reuse of N95 Respirators on Respirator Fit.Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Malia McAvoy *Greater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9998-4737
Ai-Tram N Bui *Greater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0133-7935
Christopher Hansen *Greater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6640-2745
Deborah Plana *Greater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4218-1693
Jordan T SaidGreater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0357-6916
Zizi YuGreater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-0777
Helen YangGreater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9455-5300
Jacob FreakeGreater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5198-835X
Christopher VanGreater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3262-964X
David KrikorianGreater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Avilash CramerGreater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0014-8921
Leanne SmithGreater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Liwei JiangGreater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1863-6803
Karen J LeeDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4255-8355
Sara J LiDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Brandon BellerGreater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kimberley HugginsHarvard Graduate School of Design, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Michael P ShortGreater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9216-2482
Sherry H YuGreater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1432-9128
Arash MostaghimiGreater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6084-5617
Peter K SorgerGreater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. peter_sorger@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3364-1838
Nicole R LeBoeufGreater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. nleboeuf@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8264-834X
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USBoston University · US

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM007753 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WALENSKY, LOREN DAVID · 1985 to 2021
$50.0M
Systems Pharmacology of Therapeutic and Adverse Responses to ImmuneCheckpoint and Small Molecule DrugsU54CA225088 · NCI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SORGER, PETER KARL · 2018 to 2022
$10.8M
Harvard MIT Center for Regulatory Sciences Harvard MIT Center for Regulatory SciencesNCI NIH HHS U54 CA225088NCI NIH HHS U54-CA225088NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007753NIGMS NIH HHS T32-GM007753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to supply shortages caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs or "masks"), which are typically single-use devices in healthcare settings, are routinely being used for prolonged periods and in some cases decontaminated under "reuse" and "extended use" policies. However, the reusability of N95 masks is limited by degradation of fit. Possible substitutes, such as KN95 masks meeting Chinese standards, frequently fail fit testing even when new. The purpose of this study was to develop an inexpensive frame for damaged and poorly fitting masks using readily available materials and 3D printing.

resultsAn iterative design process yielded a mask frame consisting of two 3D printed side pieces, malleable wire links that users press against their face, and cut lengths of elastic material that go around the head to hold the frame and mask in place. Volunteers (n = 45; average BMI = 25.4), underwent qualitative fit testing with and without mask frames wearing one or more of four different brands of FFRs conforming to US N95 or Chinese KN95 standards. Masks passed qualitative fit testing in the absence of a frame at rates varying from 48 to 94 % (depending on mask model). For individuals who underwent testing using respirators with broken or defective straps, 80-100 % (average 85 %) passed fit testing with mask frames. Among individuals who failed fit testing with a KN95, ~ 50 % passed testing by using a frame.

conclusionsOur study suggests that mask frames can prolong the lifespan of N95 and KN95 masks by serving as a substitute for broken or defective bands without adversely affecting fit. Use of frames made it possible for ~ 73 % of the test population to achieve a good fit based on qualitative and quantitative testing criteria, approaching the 85-90 % success rate observed for intact N95 masks. Frames therefore represent a simple and inexpensive way of expanding access to PPE and extending their useful life. For clinicians and institutions interested in mask frames, designs and specifications are provided without restriction for use or modification. To ensure adequate performance in clinical settings, fit testing with user-specific masks and PanFab frames is required.

Indexed as

3D printingCOVID-19filtering face piece (FFP) respiratorKN95 masksmask framesN95 respiratorsoccupational healthpandemic responsepersonal protective equipment (PPE)prototyping

Identifiers

PMID34099062
PMCPMC8182357
OpenAlexW3166089035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.