Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34099055›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2021

Techno-economic evaluation of microalgae high-density liquid fuel production at 12 international locations.

John Roles, Jennifer Yarnold, Karen Hussey, Ben Hankamer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  3. Microalgae cultivation: closing the yield gap from laboratory to field scale.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John Roles *Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, 306 Carmody Road, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Jennifer Yarnold *Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, 306 Carmody Road, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Karen HusseyCentre for Policy Futures, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Ben HankamerInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, 306 Carmody Road, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. b.hankamer@uq.edu.au.

Funding

Australian Research Council LP150101147Australian Research Council LP180100269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroalgae-based high-density fuels offer an efficient and environmental pathway towards decarbonization of the transport sector and could be produced as part of a globally distributed network without competing with food systems for arable land. Variations in climatic and economic conditions significantly impact the economic feasibility and productivity of such fuel systems, requiring harmonized technoeconomic assessments to identify important conditions required for commercial scale up.

methodsHere, our previously validated Techno-economic and Lifecycle Analysis (TELCA) platform was extended to provide a direct performance comparison of microalgae diesel production at 12 international locations with variable climatic and economic settings. For each location, historical weather data, and jurisdiction-specific policy and economic inputs were used to simulate algal productivity, evaporation rates, harvest regime, CapEx and OpEx, interest and tax under location-specific operational parameters optimized for Minimum Diesel Selling Price (MDSP, US$ L

resultsUnder a for-profit business model, 10 of the 12 locations achieved a minimum diesel selling price (MDSP) under US$ 1.85 L

conclusionsThe public utility approach could reduce the fuel price toward cost-competitiveness, providing a key step on the path to a profitable fully commercial renewable fuel industry by attracting the investment needed to advance technology and commercial biorefinery co-production options. Governments' adoption of such an approach could accelerate decarbonization, improve fuel security, and help support a local COVID-19 economic recovery. This study highlights the benefits and limitations of different factors at each location (e.g., climate, labour costs, policy, C-credits) in terms of the development of the technology-providing insights on how governments, investors and industry can drive the technology forward.

Indexed as

Algae-based fuelEnergy productionFuel securityRenewable fuelsTechno-economic analysis

Identifiers

PMID34099055
PMCPMC8183327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.