Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34099028›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2021

Flow Index: a novel, non-invasive, continuous, quantitative method to evaluate patient inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation.

Filippo Albani, Luigi Pisani, Gianni Ciabatti, Federica Fusina, Barbara Buizza, Anna Granato, Valeria Lippolis, Eros Aniballi, Francesco Murgolo, Antonio Rosano and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Filippo AlbaniDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Luigi PisaniDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Miulli Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Bari, Italy.
Gianni CiabattiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Neurointensive Care Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
Federica FusinaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy. f.fusina@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3341-5793
Barbara BuizzaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Anna GranatoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Valeria LippolisDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Mater Dei Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Eros AniballiDepartment of Anesthesia, I.R.C.C.S. MultiMedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milano, Italy.
Francesco MurgoloDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Antonio RosanoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Nicola LatronicoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Massimo AntonelliDepartment of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Fondazione Policlinico, Universitario A. Gemelli, Roma, Italy.
Salvatore GrassoDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Giuseppe NataliniDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · THMultiMedica · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evaluation of patient effort is pivotal during pressure support ventilation, but a non-invasive, continuous, quantitative method to assess patient inspiratory effort is still lacking. We hypothesized that the concavity of the inspiratory flow-time waveform could be useful to estimate patient's inspiratory effort. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the shape of the inspiratory flow, as quantified by a numeric indicator, could be associated with inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation.

methodsTwenty-four patients in pressure support ventilation were enrolled. A mathematical relationship describing the decay pattern of the inspiratory flow profile was developed. The parameter hypothesized to estimate effort was named Flow Index. Esophageal pressure, airway pressure, airflow, and volume waveforms were recorded at three support levels (maximum, minimum and baseline). The association between Flow Index and reference measures of patient effort (pressure time product and pressure generated by respiratory muscles) was evaluated using linear mixed effects models adjusted for tidal volume, respiratory rate and respiratory rate/tidal volume.

resultsFlow Index was different at the three pressure support levels and all group comparisons were statistically significant. In all tested models, Flow Index was independently associated with patient effort (p < 0.001). Flow Index prediction of inspiratory effort agreed with esophageal pressure-based methods.

conclusionsFlow Index is associated with patient inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation, and may provide potentially useful information for setting inspiratory support and monitoring patient-ventilator interactions.

Indexed as

Inspiratory CapacityAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory MechanicsWeights and MeasuresArtificial respirationInspiratory effortIntensive care unitsPatient-ventilator interactionPositive-pressure respiration

Identifiers

PMID34099028
PMCPMC8182360
OpenAlexW3169861709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.