Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34099004›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2021

Implementation of peer specialist services in VA primary care: a cluster randomized trial on the impact of external facilitation.

Matthew Chinman, Richard Goldberg, Karin Daniels, Anjana Muralidharan, Jeffrey Smith, Sharon McCarthy, Deborah Medoff, Amanda Peeples, Lorrianne Kuykendall, Natalie Vineyard and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02732600 (Program Evaluation of Peer Specialists on VA PACTS), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02732600 nacompletednot on this map

Program Evaluation of Peer Specialists on VA PACTS: A Quality Improvement Project (QUE 15-289)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2016 to 2019Enrolled5,616ConditionsMental Illness, Physical IllnessArmsFacilitated Implementation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Increasing access to behavioral health care: Examples of task shifting in two U.S. government health care systems.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew ChinmanVISN 4 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. chinman@rand.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5390-8723
Richard GoldbergVISN 5 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Karin DanielsCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Anjana MuralidharanVISN 5 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jeffrey SmithVA Behavioral Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, AR, USA.
Sharon McCarthyVISN 4 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Deborah MedoffVISN 5 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Amanda PeeplesVISN 5 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lorrianne KuykendallVISN 5 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Natalie VineyardVISN 5 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lan LiVISN 5 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Baltimore, MD, USA.
VA Capitol Health Care Network · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · USCentral Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System · USRAND Corporation · US

Funding

HSRD VA IP1 HX001979RRD VA IK2 RX002339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 1100 veterans work in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) as peer specialists (PSs)-those with formal training who support other veterans with similar diagnoses. A White House Executive Action mandated the pilot reassignment of VHA PSs from their usual placement in mental health to 25 primary care Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACTs) in order to broaden the provision of wellness services that can address many chronic illnesses. An evaluation of this initiative was undertaken to assess the impact of outside assistance on the deployment of PSs in PACTs, as implementation support is often needed to prevent challenges commonly experienced when first deploying PSs in new settings.

methodsThis study was a cluster-randomized hybrid II effectiveness-implementation trial to test the impact of minimal implementation support vs. facilitated implementation on the deployment of VHA PSs in PACT over 2 years. Twenty-five Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) were recruited to reassign mental health PSs to provide wellness-oriented care in PACT. Sites in three successive cohorts (n = 7, 10, 8) over 6-month blocks were matched and randomized to each study condition. In facilitated implementation, an outside expert worked with site stakeholders through a site visit and regular calls, and provided performance data to guide the planning and address challenges. Minimal implementation sites received a webinar and access to the VHA Office of Mental Health Services work group. The two conditions were compared on PS workload data and veteran measures of activation, satisfaction, and functioning. Qualitative interviews collected information on perceived usefulness of the PS services.

resultsIn the first year, sites that received facilitation had higher numbers of unique veterans served and a higher number of PS visits, although the groups did not differ after the second year. Also, sites receiving external facilitation started delivering PS services more quickly than minimal support sites. All sites in the external facilitation condition continued in the pilot into the second year, whereas two of the sites in the minimal assistance condition dropped out after the first year. There were no differences between groups on veterans' outcomes-activation, satisfaction, and functioning. Most veterans were very positive about the help they received as evidenced in the qualitative interviews. DISCUSSION: These findings demonstrate that external facilitation can be effective in supporting the implementation of PSs in primary care settings. The lack of significant differences across conditions after the second year highlights the positive outcomes associated with active facilitation, while also raising the important question of whether longer-term success may require some level of ongoing facilitation and implementation support.

trial registrationThis project is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT02732600 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02732600 ).

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesVeteransHumansPeer GroupPrimary Health CareSpecializationUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsFacilitationImplementationPeer specialistPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID34099004
PMCPMC8183089
OpenAlexW3153331000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.