Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34098988›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2021

Determinants of safety climate at primary care level in Ghana, Malawi and Uganda: a cross-sectional study across 138 selected primary healthcare facilities.

Frédérique Vallières, Paul Mubiri, Samuel Agyei Agyemang, Samuel Amon, Jana Gerold, Tim Martineau, Ann Nolan, Thomasena O'Byrne, Lifah Sanudi, Freddie Sengooba and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Frédérique VallièresTrinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Paul MubiriSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Samuel Agyei AgyemangSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, P. O. Box LG13, Accra, Ghana.
Samuel AmonSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, P. O. Box LG13, Accra, Ghana.
Jana GeroldSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. jana.gerold@swisstph.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-1456-5638
Tim MartineauLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Ann NolanTrinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Thomasena O'ByrneTrinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Lifah SanudiResearch for Equity and Community Health Trust (REACH Trust), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Freddie SengoobaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Helen PrytherchSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafety climate is an essential component of achieving Universal Health Coverage, with several organisational, unit or team-level, and individual health worker factors identified as influencing safety climate. Few studies however, have investigated how these factors contribute to safety climate within health care settings in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The current study examines the relationship between key organisational, unit and individual-level factors and safety climate across primary health care centres in Ghana, Malawi and Uganda.

methodsA cross-sectional, self-administered survey was conducted across 138 primary health care facilities in nine districts across Uganda, Ghana and Malawi. In total, 760 primary health workers completed the questionnaire. The relationships between individual (sex, job satisfaction), unit (teamwork climate, supportive supervision), organisational-level (district managerial support) and safety climate were tested using structural equation modelling (SEM) procedures. Post hoc analyses were also carried out to explore these relationships within each country.

resultsOur model including all countries explained 55% of the variance in safety climate. In this model, safety climate was most strongly associated with teamwork (β = 0.56, p < 0.001), supportive supervision (β = 0.34, p < 0.001), and district managerial support (β = 0.29, p < 0.001). In Ghana, safety climate was positively associated with job satisfaction (β = 0.30, p < 0.05), teamwork (β = 0.46, p < 0.001), and supportive supervision (β = 0.21, p < 0.05), whereby the model explained 43% of the variance in safety climate. In Uganda, the total variance explained by the model was 64%, with teamwork (β = 0.56, p < 0.001), supportive supervision (β = 0.43, p < 0.001), and perceived district managerial support (β = 0.35, p < 0.001) all found to be positively associated with climate. In Malawi, the total variance explained by the model was 63%, with teamwork (β = 0.39, p = 0.005) and supportive supervision (β = 0.27, p = 0.023) significantly and positively associated with safety climate. DISCUSSION/

conclusionsOur findings highlight the importance of unit-level factors-and in specific, teamwork and supportive supervision-as particularly important contributors to perceptions of safety climate among primary health workers in LMICs. Implications for practice are discussed.

Indexed as

Organizational CulturePrimary Health CareCross-Sectional StudiesGhanaHumansMalawiUgandaLow- and middle-income countriesPrimary healthSafety climate

Identifiers

PMID34098988
PMCPMC8186040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.