Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34098965›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2021

Determining optimal clinical target volume margins in high-grade glioma based on microscopic tumor extension and magnetic resonance imaging.

Shulun Nie, Yufang Zhu, Jia Yang, Tao Xin, Song Xue, Xianbin Zhang, Jujie Sun, Dianbin Mu, Yongsheng Gao, Zhaoqiu Chen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Recurrence analysis of glioblastoma cases based on distance and dose information.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shulun NieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Qingdao Road 6699, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Yufang ZhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Jia YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Tao XinDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Song XueDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Xianbin ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Jujie SunDepartment of Pathology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Dianbin MuDepartment of Pathology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Yongsheng GaoDepartment of Pathology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Zhaoqiu ChenDepartment of Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Xingchen DingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Jinming YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Qingdao Road 6699, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, People's Republic of China. sdyujinming@163.com.
Man HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Qingdao Road 6699, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, People's Republic of China. human5770@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4409-286X

Funding

Key Technology Research and Development Program of Shandong (CN) 2019GGX101057National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFE0114100Science Technology Program of Jinan 201805051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn this study, we performed a consecutive macropathologic analysis to assess microscopic extension (ME) in high-grade glioma (HGG) to determine appropriate clinical target volume (CTV) margins for radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study included HGG patients with tumors located in non-functional areas, and supratotal resection was performed. The ME distance from the edge of the tumor to the microscopic tumor cells surrounding brain tissue was measured. Associations between the extent of ME and clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated by multivariate linear regression (MVLR) analysis. An ME predictive model was developed based on the MVLR model.

resultsBetween June 2017 and July 2019, 652 pathologic slides obtained from 30 HGG patients were analyzed. The mean ME distance was 1.70 cm (range, 0.63 to 2.87 cm). The MVLR analysis identified that pathologic grade, subventricular zone (SVZ) contact and O

conclusionME was heterogeneously distributed across different grades of gliomas according to the tumor location and molecular marker status, which indicated that CTV delineation should be individualized. The model could predict the ME of HGG, which may help clinicians determine the CTV for individual patients. Trial registration The trial was registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100046106). Registered 4 May 2021-Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19DNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm StagingPatient-Specific ModelingBiomarkers, TumorDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMGMT protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsClinical target volumeHigh-grade gliomaMacropathologyMicroscopic extensionPredictive modelRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID34098965
PMCPMC8186169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.