Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34098949›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical science2021

Multiscale X-ray phase contrast imaging of human cartilage for investigating osteoarthritis formation.

Annie Horng, Johannes Stroebel, Tobias Geith, Stefan Milz, Alexandra Pacureanu, Yang Yang, Peter Cloetens, Goran Lovric, Alberto Mittone, Alberto Bravin and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Latest advancements in imaging techniques in OA.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Annie Horng *Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Johannes Stroebel *Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Am Coulombwall 1, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Tobias GeithDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar of the Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefan MilzFaculty of Medicine, Anatomische Anstalt, Neuroanatomy, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Alexandra PacureanuEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France.
Yang YangEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France.
Peter CloetensEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France.
Goran LovricPaul Scherrer Institute (Swiss Light Source), Villigen, Switzerland.
Alberto MittoneCELLS: ALBA Synchrotron, Barcelona, Spain.
Alberto BravinEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France.
Paola CoanDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Paola.Coan@physik.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1399-2398
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility · FRLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEALBA Synchrotron (Spain) · ESBrookhaven National Laboratory · USIhre-Radiologen · DEPaul Scherrer Institute · CHTUM Klinikum · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Cluster of Excellence) Munich Center for Advanced Photonics EXE158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evolution of cartilage degeneration is still not fully understood, partly due to its thinness, low radio-opacity and therefore lack of adequately resolving imaging techniques. X-ray phase-contrast imaging (X-PCI) offers increased sensitivity with respect to standard radiography and CT allowing an enhanced visibility of adjoining, low density structures with an almost histological image resolution. This study examined the feasibility of X-PCI for high-resolution (sub-) micrometer analysis of different stages in tissue degeneration of human cartilage samples and compare it to histology and transmission electron microscopy.

methodsTen 10%-formalin preserved healthy and moderately degenerated osteochondral samples, post-mortem extracted from human knee joints, were examined using four different X-PCI tomographic set-ups using synchrotron radiation the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (France) and the Swiss Light Source (Switzerland). Volumetric datasets were acquired with voxel sizes between 0.7 × 0.7 × 0.7 and 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 µm

resultsX-PCI provides a three-dimensional visualization of healthy and moderately degenerated cartilage samples down to a (sub-)cellular level with good correlation to histologic and transmission electron microscopy images. X-PCI is able to resolve the three layers and the architectural organization of cartilage including changes in chondrocyte cell morphology, chondrocyte subgroup distribution and (re-)organization as well as its subtle matrix structures.

conclusionsX-PCI captures comprehensive cartilage tissue transformation in its environment and might serve as a tissue-preserving, staining-free and volumetric virtual histology tool for examining and chronicling cartilage behavior in basic research/laboratory experiments of cartilage disease evolution.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCartilage, ArticularFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastOsteoarthritisTomography, X-Ray Computed3D analysisCartilageOsteoarthritisVirtual histologyX-ray phase-contrast imaging

Identifiers

PMID34098949
PMCPMC8182937
OpenAlexW3166496510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.