Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34098908›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

REMARRY and PURSUIT trials: liquid biopsy-guided rechallenge with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy with panitumumab plus irinotecan for patients with plasma RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

Hiromichi Nakajima, Daisuke Kotani, Hideaki Bando, Takeshi Kato, Eiji Oki, Eiji Shinozaki, Yu Sunakawa, Kentaro Yamazaki, Satoshi Yuki, Yoshiaki Nakamura and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Novel biomarkers for early detection of gastric cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  16. Therapeutic landscape and future direction of metastatic colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Hiromichi NakajimaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Daisuke KotaniDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Hideaki BandoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Takeshi KatoDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Eiji OkiDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Eiji ShinozakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Yu SunakawaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Kentaro YamazakiDivison of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Satoshi YukiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yoshiaki NakamuraDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Takeharu YamanakaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Takayuki YoshinoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Takashi OhtaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan.
Hiroya TaniguchiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Yoshinori KagawaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, 3-1-56 Bandai-Higashi, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka, Japan. yoshikagawa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6876-4507
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JPKansai Rosai Hospital · JPKyushu University · JPOsaka National Hospital · JPOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious clinical trials have demonstrated the potential efficacy of rechallenge with anti- epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for patients with RAS/BRAF V600E wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Moreover, post hoc biomarker analyses of clinical trials has suggested that RAS status in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has a high probability to select patients who could benefit from anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge.

methodsThis trial is composed of 2 phases: a monitoring phase (REMARRY) and a trial phase (PURSUIT). A monitoring phase, the REMARRY study, aims to evaluate the dynamics of plasma RAS status during the subsequent treatments after refractory to anti-EGFR therapy in patients with mCRC with RAS/BRAF V600E wild-type tumors who have progressed after a response to previous anti-EGFR therapy, using a highly sensitive digital polymerase chain reaction OncoBEAM RAS CRC kit in a central laboratory (Sysmex, Japan). A trial phase, the PURSUIT trial, is a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of rechallenge therapy with panitumumab plus irinotecan in patients without RAS mutations in ctDNA (plasma RAS negative) in the REMARRY study. Key eligibility criteria of the PURSUIT trial include RAS/BRAF V600E wild-type mCRC in tumor tissue refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan; progression after complete or partial response to previous anti-EGFR therapy; plasma RAS negative (defined as plasma mutant allele frequencies [MAF] of all RAS ≤ 0.1%) within 28 days prior to enrollment; 4 months or more between the last administration of previous anti-EGFR mAb and the start of protocol treatment; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) ≤ 1. The primary endpoint is the confirmed objective response rate (ORR). The target sample size of the PURSUIT trial is 50 patients. Biomarker analyses will be performed in parallel using the OncoBEAM RAS CRC kit and a next-generation sequencing-based ctDNA analysis (Guardant360). DISCUSSION: Our trial aims to confirm the clinical benefit of anti-EGFR mAb rechallenge therapy in patients with plasma RAS negative. Moreover, through biomarker analyses, our trial will shed light on which patients would benefit from rechallenge in addition to being plasma RAS negative.

trial registrationThe REMARRY study: UMIN, UMIN000036424 . Registered date: April 5, 2019. The PURSUIT trial: jRCT, jRCTs031190096 . Registered date: October 1, 2019.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErbB ReceptorsHumansIrinotecanJapanLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsIrinotecanPanitumumabras ProteinsAnti-EGFR mAbCirculating tumor DNALiquid biopsyMetastatic colorectal cancerRechallenge

Identifiers

PMID34098908
PMCPMC8186219
OpenAlexW3166878791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.