Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34098869›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

Genome-wide characterization of microsatellite DNA in fishes: survey and analysis of their abundance and frequency in genome-specific regions.

Yi Lei, Yu Zhou, Megan Price, Zhaobin Song

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic Characterization and Phylogenetic Relationships ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Whole-Genome Sequencing ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genome-Wide Microsatellites inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  12. Genome-Wide In Silico Analysis of Microsatellite Loci in Rabbits.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  13. A Whole-Genome Survey and the Mitochondrial Genome ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi LeiSichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, People's Republic of China.
Yu ZhouSichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, People's Republic of China.
Megan PriceSichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, People's Republic of China.
Zhaobin SongSichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, People's Republic of China. zbsong@scu.edu.cn.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrosatellite repeats are ubiquitous in organism genomes and play an important role in the chromatin organization, regulation of gene activity, recombination and DNA replication. Although microsatellite distribution patterns have been studied in most phylogenetic lineages, they are unclear in fish species.

resultsHere, we present the first systematic examination of microsatellite distribution in coding and non-coding regions of 14 fish genomes. Our study showed that the number and type of microsatellites displayed nonrandom distribution for both intragenic and intergenic regions, suggesting that they have potential roles in transcriptional or translational regulation and DNA replication slippage theories alone were insufficient to explain the distribution patterns. Our results showed that microsatellites are dominant in non-coding regions. The total number of microsatellites ranged from 78,378 to 1,012,084, and the relative density varied from 4925.76 bp/Mb to 25,401.97 bp/Mb. Overall, (A + T)-rich repeats were dominant. The dependence of repeat abundance on the length of the repeated unit (1-6 nt) showed a great similarity decrease, whereas more tri-nucleotide repeats were found in exonic regions than tetra-nucleotide repeats of most species. Moreover, the incidence of different repeated types appeared species- and genomic-specific. These results highlight potential mechanisms for maintaining microsatellite distribution, such as selective forces and mismatch repair systems.

conclusionsOur data could be beneficial for the studies of genome evolution and microsatellite DNA evolutionary dynamics, and facilitate the exploration of microsatellites structural, function, composition mode and molecular markers development in these species.

Indexed as

GenomeMicrosatellite RepeatsAnimalsDNA, IntergenicFishesPhylogenyDNA, IntergenicDistribution patternsFish speciesGenomic regionsMicrosatellites

Identifiers

PMID34098869
PMCPMC8186053
OpenAlexW3167895074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.