Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34098769›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2021

The role of lymph node dissection and a new N-staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a study from the SEER database.

Hanjie Hu, Hong Zhao, Jianqiang Cai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanjie HuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3417-1839
Hong ZhaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jianqiang CaiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend routine lymph node dissection (LND) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the role of LND remains controversial, and the node (N) stage is oversimplified.

methodsPatients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results research data 18 (SEER 18). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias, and Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare overall survival (OS). The best cutoff values were found using X-tile software.

resultsOf 2037 patients included in SEER 18, 1147 underwent LND (56.3%); 389 (34.3%) had pathologically confirmed lymph node metastasis (LNM), and 316 (27.6%) had at least 6 LNDs. The median OS was worse for LND patients (34 months vs. 40 months, respectively), and this result remained after PSM. Male sex, age ≥60 years, tumor size > 5 cm, and LNM were independent prognostic risk factors for ICC. LNM ≥3 was associated with worse OS.

conclusionsOnly a few LNDs met the requirements per the guidelines. LND does not improve OS in ICC, and the best approach to LND and a better N staging method should be explored further.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Stagingintrahepatic cholangiocarcinomalymph nodeLymph node dissectionmetastasisN-staging systemSurveillance Epidemiology and End Results

Identifiers

PMID34098769
PMCPMC8191081
OpenAlexW3166840729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.