Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34098587›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2021

Parental perception of FIRES outcomes, emotional states, and social media usage.

Raquel Farias-Moeller, Alexandra Wood, Rachel Sawdy, Jennifer Koop, Krisjon Olson, Andreas van Baalen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raquel Farias-MoellerDivision of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8717-7703
Alexandra WoodDivision of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Rachel SawdyDivision of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Jennifer KoopDivision of Pediatric Neuropsychology, Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Krisjon OlsonDivision of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Andreas van BaalenDepartment of Neuropediatrics, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7988-5224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate parental perception of FIRES outcomes, assess emotional states and related social media usage.

methodsA survey-based study of parents of children with FIRES participating in a FIRES-specific Facebook group was performed. The survey collected information on medical aspects of their child's course in the acute, subacute, and chronic periods, emotional states, and social media usage. Child outcome was assessed utilizing the pediatric extended Glasgow outcome scale (GOS-E). Parental emotional states were assessed utilizing the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS). Descriptive statistics were performed. Associations were described using the Spearman rank correlation. Open-ended questions were included. Thematic analysis was performed.

resultsTwenty-nine surveys were analyzed. All children were in the chronic phase at time of survey response, except for two who died. Mothers answered 22 surveys, and fathers answered seven. Median age at FIRES presentation was 5.6 years [IQR 4.2-8.95], with a median number of 3 seizures per week [IQR 0-10, range 0-50], 4 daily anti-seizure medicines [IQR 3-5], and chronic GOS-E of 6 [IQR 2-8 range 2-8]. Most parents reported none to mild levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. Higher seizure burden positively correlated with parental depression symptoms (r = .41 (95% CI 0.01, 0.70), P = .045). Most parents found social media helpful with coping and 96% desired FIRES research advertised. Twenty-five parents shared their recommendations to fellow parents and the medical team in an open-ended format. Themes included support, expertise, and medical advice. SIGNIFICANCE: Despite their children's significantly impaired functional outcome after FIRES and high rates of medically refractory epilepsy, the cohort demonstrated remarkable emotional resilience. They perceive social media as beneficial, are interested in social media-advertised research, and share valuable advice. Social media may serve as an introductory platform to enhance the physician-scientist-parent/patient relationship.

Indexed as

Social MediaAdaptation, PsychologicalChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMothersParentsPerceptionepilepsyfebrile infection-related epilepsy syndromenew-onset refractory status epilepticussocial media

Identifiers

PMID34098587
PMCPMC8408589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.