Trial reportAmerican journal of nephrology2021
Therapeutic Effects of Add-On Tenapanor for Hemodialysis Patients with Refractory Hyperphosphatemia.
Trial report in American journal of nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phosphate binders for preventing and treating chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of tenapanor vs placebo in treating CKD patients on dialysis and with hyperphosphatemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2251 patients.International urology and nephrology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of tenapanor in end-stage renal disease patients with hyperphosphatemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Renal failure · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Efficacy of tenapanor in managing hyperphosphatemia and constipation in hemodialysis patients: A randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Long-term safety and decrease of pill burden by tenapanor therapy: a phase 3 open-label study in hemodialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- The Impact of Tenapanor on Serum Phosphate in Adult Dialysis Patients: A Narrative Review.Kidney medicine · 2026Review
- Cholestyramine in hemodialysis: a new approach for hyperphosphatemia management.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2025Article
- Hyperphosphatemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: The Search for New Treatment Paradigms and the Role of Tenapanor.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2024Review
- Tenapanor in Chinese ESRD patients with hyperphosphatemia on haemodialysis: a randomised, phase 3 trial.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- Randomized Study of Tenapanor Added to Phosphate Binders for Patients With Refractory Hyperphosphatemia.Kidney international reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPhosphate binders are used to treat hyperphosphatemia. Some patients have inappropriately controlled serum phosphorus levels, which may occur for many reasons, including a high pill burden and adverse events (AEs). Tenapanor selectively inhibits the passive paracellular transfer of phosphate in the gastrointestinal tract, thereby reducing serum phosphorus levels. This novel mechanism of action may contribute to improved phosphate management. The efficacy and safety of tenapanor have not been evaluated in Japanese patients with high serum phosphorus levels despite treatment with phosphate binders. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of add-on tenapanor therapy for reducing serum phosphorus levels in this population.
methodsThis multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolled patients with refractory hyperphosphatemia undergoing hemodialysis. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive tenapanor or placebo as an add-on to their phosphate binder regimen for 6 weeks. Change in serum phosphorus levels at week 6 (day 43) compared with the baseline value (day 1, week 0) (primary endpoint), achievement of target serum phosphorus levels (serum phosphorus level ≤6.0 or ≤5.5 mg/dL), and safety, based on all AEs and drug-related AEs, were among the outcomes evaluated.
resultsIn total, 24 patients were randomly assigned to the placebo group and 23 to the tenapanor group. The mean serum phosphorus level decreased from 7.01 mg/dL on day 1 to 6.69 mg/dL on day 43 in the placebo group and from 6.77 mg/dL on day 1 to 4.67 mg/dL on day 43 in the tenapanor group. In the placebo and tenapanor groups (modified intent-to-treat population), the mean (standard deviation) change in the serum phosphorus level at day 43 (last observation carried forward [LOCF]) was 0.08 (1.52) mg/dL and -1.99 (1.24) mg/dL, respectively, with a between-group difference of -2.07 (95% confidence interval: -2.89, -1.26; p < 0.001). The target achievement rate (serum phosphorus level ≤6.0 mg/dL at week 6 [LOCF]) was 37.5 and 87.0% in the placebo and tenapanor groups, respectively. Diarrhea was the most common drug-related AE, and it occurred in 8.3 and 65.2% of patients in the placebo and tenapanor groups, respectively. No specific AEs were observed with add-on tenapanor or with phosphate binders. DISCUSSION/
conclusionTherapy with existing phosphate binders and add-on tenapanor resulted in a significant decrease in serum phosphorus level compared with the placebo group in patients with refractory hyperphosphatemia despite treatment with phosphate binders. No new safety signals were raised, and add-on tenapanor was generally well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.