Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34098318›Full record

ArticleSeizure2021

Physician and patient satisfaction with the switch to remote outpatient encounters in epilepsy clinics during the Covid-19 pandemic.

T Teng, D E Sareidaki, N Chemaly, C Bar, D Coste-Zeitoun, M Kuchenbuch, R Nabbout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Seizure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

T TengReference center for rare epilepsies, Department of Pediatric Neurology, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, APHP, Member of the ERN EpiCARE, Paris, France.
D E SareidakiReference center for rare epilepsies, Department of Pediatric Neurology, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, APHP, Member of the ERN EpiCARE, Paris, France.
N ChemalyReference center for rare epilepsies, Department of Pediatric Neurology, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, APHP, Member of the ERN EpiCARE, Paris, France.
C BarReference center for rare epilepsies, Department of Pediatric Neurology, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, APHP, Member of the ERN EpiCARE, Paris, France.
D Coste-ZeitounReference center for rare epilepsies, Department of Pediatric Neurology, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, APHP, Member of the ERN EpiCARE, Paris, France.
M KuchenbuchReference center for rare epilepsies, Department of Pediatric Neurology, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, APHP, Member of the ERN EpiCARE, Paris, France; Laboratory of Translational Research for Neurological Disorders, INSERM UMR 1163, Imagine Institute, Université de Paris, France.
R NabboutReference center for rare epilepsies, Department of Pediatric Neurology, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, APHP, Member of the ERN EpiCARE, Paris, France; Laboratory of Translational Research for Neurological Disorders, INSERM UMR 1163, Imagine Institute, Université de Paris, France. Electronic address: rimanabbout@aphp.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnalyzing parents' and physicians' opinions regarding phone-based encounters in emergency shifts of a French pediatric epilepsy center compared to traditional face-to-face encounters during the first lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic

methodsProspective monocentric study on remote encounters at Necker rare epilepsy reference center from March 20th, 2020 to April 23rd, 2020 due to lockdown measures. This study was conducted with a survey based on 5-point Likert scales (LS

resultsWe had a total of 224 responses, among which 204 were completed by physicians (91%) and 173 (84,4%) by parents. Twenty five were first encounters (14,2%). Physicians pointed out the need for clinical examination (42.6%), mainly for first encounters (p=0.0004). Physicians rated the quality of communication lower (p=0.003) as their capacity to answer parents' questions (p=0.004). They were significantly less satisfied with remote encounters compared to parents (p<10

conclusionRemote encounters could be a helpful practice for pediatric patients with epilepsy in emergency situations such as pandemics. It allowed the identification and prioritization of emergency situations. Physicians were less positive than parents. We raised the possible use of remote encounters in association to face-to-face encounters for routine follow-up of pediatric patients with epilepsy.

Indexed as

COVID-19EpilepsyPhysiciansTelemedicineChildCommunicable Disease ControlHumansOutpatientsPandemicsPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Child neurologyEEGFollow-upTelehealthTelemedicineVirtual care

Identifiers

PMID34098318
PMCPMC9525220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.