Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34098301›Full record

Trial reportJournal of substance abuse treatment2021

Naturalistic follow-up after a trial of medications for opioid use disorder: Medication status, opioid use, and relapse.

Miranda G Greiner, Matisyahu Shulman, Tse-Hwei Choo, Jennifer Scodes, Martina Pavlicova, Aimee N C Campbell, Patricia Novo, Marc Fishman, Joshua D Lee, John Rotrosen and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Organization of primary care and early MOUD discontinuation.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miranda G GreinerNew York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, United States of America. Electronic address: miranda.greiner@nyspi.columbia.edu.
Matisyahu ShulmanNew York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, United States of America. Electronic address: matisyahu.shulman@nyspi.columbia.edu.
Tse-Hwei ChooNew York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, United States of America. Electronic address: tse.hwei@nyspi.columbia.edu.
Jennifer ScodesNew York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, United States of America. Electronic address: jennifer.scodes@nyspi.columbia.edu.
Martina PavlicovaColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, United States of America. Electronic address: mp2370@columbia.edu.
Aimee N C CampbellNew York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, United States of America. Electronic address: anc2002@cumc.columbia.edu.
Patricia NovoNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America. Electronic address: patricia.novo@nyulangone.org.
Marc FishmanJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Maryland Treatment Centers, 3800 Frederick Ave, Baltimore, MD 21229, United States of America.
Joshua D LeeNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America. Electronic address: joshua.lee@nyulangone.org.
John RotrosenNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America. Electronic address: john.rotrosen@nyulangone.org.
Edward V NunesNew York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, United States of America. Electronic address: edward.nunes@nyspi.columbia.edu.
Columbia University · USNew York University · USArthritis Treatment Center · US

Funding

Project-003UG1DA013035 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Aimee N Campbell, Jennifer McNeely · 2015 to 2026
$130.3M
Translational Clinical Research Fellowship on Substance Use DisordersT32DA007294 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Frances Rudnick Levin, Diana M Martinez · 1993 to 2026
$9.3M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007294NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis report examined naturalistic opioid use outcomes and utilization of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) 36 weeks post-randomization in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) Extended-Release Naltrexone (XR-NTX) versus Buprenorphine-Naloxone (BUP-NX) for Opioid Treatment trial (CTN-0051, X:BOT).

designX:BOT was a multisite, randomized, 24-week comparative effectiveness trial of BUP-NX (N = 287) and XR-NTX (N = 283). Study medications were discontinued following treatment completion, relapse, or dropout. Participants were encouraged to continue MOUD. This report examined opioid use outcomes in 428 (75%) of the 570 participants who attended the 36-week follow-up visit. SETTING AND

participantsAdults with opioid use disorder recruited from 8 community treatment programs across the United States. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes included medication status (on/off MOUD), type of MOUD (BUP-NX, XR-NTX, or methadone), abstinence from non-prescribed opioids, opioid use days, relapse, and other substance use 30 days prior to the 36-week visit. Relapse was defined as opioid use for 4 consecutive weeks or 7 consecutive days in the past month. Baseline and clinical variables included opioid use severity, intravenous drug use, study medication assignment, and induction status.

findingsOf the 428 participants who completed the 36-week visit, 225 (53%) of participants were receiving MOUD and 203 (47%) were not. Compared to those off medication, participants on medication had fewer opioid use days (4.4 days (SD 9.0) versus 9.8 days (SD 12.1)), fewer met relapse criteria (37 (16.4%) versus 79 (38.9%)), and reported less stimulant use (34 (15.2%) versus 56 (27.7%)) and sedative use (14 (6.3%) versus 31 (15.3%)). There was no difference in abstinence rates between those on or off MOUD. A greater proportion of participants on XR-NTX (47 (53.4%) of 88 participants) were abstinent from non-prescribed opioids compared to those on buprenorphine (28 (23.3%) of 120 participants).

conclusionsNaturalistic outcomes data showed that despite potential barriers to continuing treatment in the community, about half of individuals were on opioid use disorder pharmacotherapy at follow-up and those on medication generally had better outcomes. Future research should explore barriers and facilitators to treatment retention in community settings; and developing interventions tailored to improve treatment engagement and adherence.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidOpioid-Related DisordersAdultDelayed-Action PreparationsFollow-Up StudiesHumansInjections, IntramuscularNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsRecurrenceUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidDelayed-Action PreparationsNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsAbstinenceBuprenorphineCommunity treatmentExtended-release naltrexoneOpioid use disorderRelapse

Identifiers

PMID34098301
PMCPMC8556394
OpenAlexW3165812365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.