Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34097906›Full record

ReviewExperimental eye research2021

Foundational concepts in the biology of bacterial keratitis.

Lawson Ung, James Chodosh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental eye research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Streptococcus pneumoniae keratitis: epidemiology and outcomes over 6 years in a French eye care center.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lawson UngDepartment of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Infectious Disease Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
James ChodoshDepartment of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Infectious Disease Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: james_chodosh@meei.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

Immunopathogenesis of Adenovirus KeratitisR01EY013124 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI James Chodosh, Jaya Rajaiya · 2001 to 2026
$10.8M
Novel Mechanisms in Adenoviral Ocular PathogenesisR01EY021558 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI James Chodosh, Jaya Rajaiya · 2011 to 2026
$7.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013124NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial infections of the cornea, or bacterial keratitis (BK), are notorious for causing rapidly fulminant disease and permanent vision loss, even among treated patients. In the last sixty years, dramatic upward trajectories in the frequency of BK have been observed internationally, driven in large part by the commercialization of hydrogel contact lenses in the late 1960s. Despite this worsening burden of disease, current evidence-based therapies for BK - including broad-spectrum topical antibiotics and, if indicated, topical corticosteroids - fail to salvage vision in a substantial proportion of affected patients. Amid growing concerns of rapidly diminishing antibiotic utility, there has been renewed interest in urgently needed novel treatments that may improve clinical outcomes on an individual and public health level. Bridging the translational gap in the care of BK requires the identification of new therapeutic targets and rational treatment design, but neither of these aims can be achieved without understanding the complex biological processes that determine how bacterial corneal infections arise, progress, and resolve. In this chapter, we synthesize the current wealth of human and animal experimental data that now inform our understanding of basic BK pathophysiology, in context with modern concepts in ocular immunology and microbiology. By identifying the key molecular determinants of clinical disease, we explore how novel treatments can be developed and translated into routine patient care.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBiologyCorneaEye Infections, BacterialHumansKeratitisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAdaptive immunityBacterial keratitisCorneal infectionsImmunologyInnate immunityMicrobial keratitisPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID34097906
PMCPMC8595513
OpenAlexW3169037221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.