Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34097713›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

S-ketamine in patient-controlled analgesia reduces opioid consumption in a dose-dependent manner after major lumbar fusion surgery: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Elina C V Brinck, Taru Virtanen, Sanna Mäkelä, Venla Soini, Ville-Veikko Hynninen, Jukka Mulo, Urmas Savolainen, Juho Rantakokko, Kreu Maisniemi, Antti Liukas and 5 more

5 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06021717 phase4completednot on this map

PCA Ketamine-Morphine Versus PCA Morphine as Post-Operative Analgesia in Colorectal Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical CentreRan2018 to 2019Enrolled60ConditionsKetamine, MorphineArmsKetamine-Morphine, Morphine
NCT06062550 phase4active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Different Dose Esketamine and Dexmedetomidine Combination for Supplemental Analgesia After Scoliosis Correction Surgery: A Randomized, Double-blind Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2023 to 2026Enrolled312ConditionsScoliosis Correction, Esketamine, Dexmedetomidine, Postoperative AnalgesiaArmsEsketamine
NCT06087510 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Different Dose Esketamine and Dexmedetomidine Combination for Supplemental Analgesia on Long-term Outcomes After Scoliosis Correction Surgery: Follow-up of a Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled312ConditionsScoliosis Correction, Postoperative Analgesia, Esketamine, DexmedetomidineArmsEsketamine
NCT07523321 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Perioperative Use of Dexmedetomidine-esketamine Combination on Incidence of Moderate-to-severe Pain After Spinal Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled274ConditionsSpinal Surgery, Pain Intensity, Dexmedetomidine, EsketamineArmsCombined dexmedetomidine-esketamine administration, Placebo administration
NCT07525999 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Perioperative Use of Dexmedetomidine-esketamine Combination on Incidence of Chronic Postsurgical Pain After Spinal Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled274ConditionsSpinal Surgery, Pain Intensity, Dexmedetomidine, EsketamineArmsCombined dexmedetomidine-esketamine administration, Placebo administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elina C V BrinckDivision of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Töölö Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5514-6654
Taru VirtanenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5442-6336
Sanna MäkeläDivision of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Management; Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Venla SoiniDivision of the musculoskeletal system at Turku University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Ville-Veikko HynninenDivision of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Management; Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Jukka MuloDivision of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Management; Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Urmas SavolainenDivision of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Management; Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Juho RantakokkoDivision of the musculoskeletal system at Turku University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Kreu MaisniemiDivision of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Töölö Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Antti LiukasDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Klaus T OlkkolaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Vesa KontinenDivision of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Jorvi Hospital, University of Helsinki and HUS Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2603-3807
Pekka TarkkilaDivision of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Töölö Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Marko PeltoniemiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Teijo I SaariDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1225-4561
University of Turku · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FITurku University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinal fusion surgery causes severe pain. Strong opioids, commonly used as postoperative analgesics, may have unwanted side effects. S-ketamine may be an effective analgesic adjuvant in opioid patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). However, the optimal adjunct S-ketamine dose to reduce postoperative opioid consumption is still unknown.

methodsWe randomized 107 patients at two tertiary hospitals in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial of adults undergoing major lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to four groups in order to compare the effects of three different doses of adjunct S-ketamine (0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 mg ml-1) or placebo on postoperative analgesia in oxycodone PCA. Study drugs were administered for 24 hours postoperative after which oxycodone-PCA was continued for further 48 hours. Our primary outcome was cumulative oxycodone consumption at 24 hours after surgery.

resultsOf the 100 patients analyzed, patients receiving 0.75 mg ml-1 S-ketamine in oxycodone PCA needed 25% less oxycodone at 24 h postoperatively (61.2 mg) compared with patients receiving 0.5 mg ml-1 (74.7 mg) or 0.25 mg ml-1 (74.1 mg) S-ketamine in oxycodone or oxycodone alone (81.9 mg) (mean difference: -20.6 mg; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -41 to -0.20; P = 0.048). A beneficial effect in mean change of pain intensity at rest was seen in the group receiving 0.75 mg ml-1 S-ketamine in oxycodone PCA compared with patients receiving lower ketamine doses or oxycodone alone (standardized effect size: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.013-0.32, P = 0.033). The occurrence of adverse events was similar among the groups.

conclusionsOxycodone PCA containing S-ketamine as an adjunct at a ratio of 1: 0.75 decreased cumulative oxycodone consumption at 24 h after major lumbar spinal fusion surgery without additional adverse effects.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansKetamineLumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidEsketamineKetamineOxycodone

Identifiers

PMID34097713
PMCPMC8183989
OpenAlexW3168059834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.