Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34097696›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Mark-release-recapture of male Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): Use of rhodamine B to estimate movement, mating and population parameters in preparation for an incompatible male program.

Brendan J Trewin, Daniel E Pagendam, Brian J Johnson, Chris Paton, Nigel Snoad, Scott A Ritchie, Kyran M Staunton, Bradley J White, Sara Mitchell, Nigel W Beebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dispersal and survival of gamma-irradiatedOpen veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Releasing incompatible males drives strong suppression across populations of wild andProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brendan J TrewinCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7244-4044
Daniel E PagendamCSIRO Data61, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8347-4767
Brian J JohnsonCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0545-4912
Chris PatonCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
Nigel SnoadVerily Life Sciences, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5474-250X
Scott A RitchieCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
Kyran M StauntonCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6812-3320
Bradley J WhiteVerily Life Sciences, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Sara MitchellVerily Life Sciences, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7926-1881
Nigel W BeebeCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2877-0691

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid advances in biological and digital support systems are revolutionizing the population control of invasive disease vectors such as Aedes aegypti. Methods such as the sterile and incompatible insect techniques (SIT/IIT) rely on modified males to seek out and successfully mate with females, and in doing so outcompete the wild male population for mates. Currently, these interventions most frequently infer mating success through area-wide population surveillance and estimates of mating competitiveness are rare. Furthermore, little is known about male Ae. aegypti behaviour and biology in field settings. In preparation for a large, community scale IIT program, we undertook a series of mark- release-recapture experiments using rhodamine B to mark male Ae. aegypti sperm and measure mating interactions with females. We also developed a Spatial and Temporally Evolving Isotropic Kernel (STEIK) framework to assist researchers to estimate the movement of individuals through space and time. Results showed that ~40% of wild females captured daily were unmated, suggesting interventions will need to release males multiple times per week to be effective at suppressing Ae. aegypti populations. Males moved rapidly through the landscape, particularly when released during the night. Although males moved further than what is typically observed in females of the species, survival was considerably lower. These unique insights improve our understanding of mating interactions in wild Ae. aegypti populations and lay the foundation for robust suppression strategies in the future.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionBehavior, AnimalAedesAnimal Identification SystemsAnimalsFluorescent DyesMaleMosquito ControlPopulation DynamicsRhodaminesFluorescent Dyesrhodamine BRhodamines

Identifiers

PMID34097696
PMCPMC8183986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.