Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34097695›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Learning divisive normalization in primary visual cortex.

Max F Burg, Santiago A Cadena, George H Denfield, Edgar Y Walker, Andreas S Tolias, Matthias Bethge, Alexander S Ecker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inhibition benefits neural system identification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Optimal Estimation of Local Motion-in-Depth with Naturalistic Stimuli.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. FOUNDATIONS OF VISUAL FORM SELECTIVITY IN MACAQUE AREAS V1 AND V2.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. A Turing Test for artificial nets devoted to vision.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Synapse-type-specific competitive Hebbian learning forms functional recurrent networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Predicting Single Neuron Responses of the Primary Visual Cortex with Deep Learning Model.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Max F BurgInstitute for Theoretical Physics and Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4402-4373
Santiago A CadenaInstitute for Theoretical Physics and Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7508-4443
George H DenfieldCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3699-3828
Edgar Y WalkerCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0057-957X
Andreas S ToliasBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4305-6376
Matthias BethgeInstitute for Theoretical Physics and Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Alexander S EckerInstitute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Baylor College of Medicine · USBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen · DEMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization · DE

Funding

VISION RESEARCH CENTERP30EY002520 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Samuel M Wu · 1985 to 2026
$14.8M
PRIMING THE PUMP: TRAINING PHYSICIAN-SCIENTISTS IN TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRYR25MH086466 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI Melissa Arbuckle, Eduardo David Leonardo · 2009 to 2026
$4.3M
Dissecting the Fabric of the Cerebral CortexDP1EY023176 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI TOLIAS, ANDREAS · 2012 to 2015
$3.1M
Probabilistic coding in cortical populationsR01EY026927 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MA, WEI JI, TOLIAS, ANDREAS · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Dissecting the Fabric of the Cerebral CortexDP1OD008301 · OD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI TOLIAS, ANDREAS · 2011 to 2011
$783k
Representation and propagation of uncertainty information in cortical populationsF30EY025510 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI WALKER, EDGAR YASUHIRO · 2016 to 2018
$93k
NEI NIH HHS DP1 EY023176NEI NIH HHS F30 EY025510NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002520NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026927NIH HHS DP1 OD008301NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH086466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Divisive normalization (DN) is a prominent computational building block in the brain that has been proposed as a canonical cortical operation. Numerous experimental studies have verified its importance for capturing nonlinear neural response properties to simple, artificial stimuli, and computational studies suggest that DN is also an important component for processing natural stimuli. However, we lack quantitative models of DN that are directly informed by measurements of spiking responses in the brain and applicable to arbitrary stimuli. Here, we propose a DN model that is applicable to arbitrary input images. We test its ability to predict how neurons in macaque primary visual cortex (V1) respond to natural images, with a focus on nonlinear response properties within the classical receptive field. Our model consists of one layer of subunits followed by learned orientation-specific DN. It outperforms linear-nonlinear and wavelet-based feature representations and makes a significant step towards the performance of state-of-the-art convolutional neural network (CNN) models. Unlike deep CNNs, our compact DN model offers a direct interpretation of the nature of normalization. By inspecting the learned normalization pool of our model, we gained insights into a long-standing question about the tuning properties of DN that update the current textbook description: we found that within the receptive field oriented features were normalized preferentially by features with similar orientation rather than non-specifically as currently assumed.

Indexed as

LearningAnimalsMacaca mulattaMaleNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsPhotic StimulationVisual CortexWavelet Analysis

Identifiers

PMID34097695
PMCPMC8211272
OpenAlexW3166686239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.