Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34097688›Full record

Observational studyPLoS medicine2021

Human papillomavirus seroprevalence in pregnant women following gender-neutral and girls-only vaccination programs in Finland: A cross-sectional cohort analysis following a cluster randomized trial.

Penelope Gray, Hanna Kann, Ville N Pimenoff, Tiina Eriksson, Tapio Luostarinen, Simopekka Vänskä, Heljä-Marja Surcel, Helena Faust, Joakim Dillner, Matti Lehtinen

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00534638 phase4completednot on this map

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Two Vaccination Strategies Using GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals' HPV Vaccine GSK580299 (Cervarix) Administered in Healthy Adolescents

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2007 to 2014Enrolled34,412ConditionsInfections, PapillomavirusArmsCervarix, Engerix-B
NCT02149030 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Effectiveness of Cervical Screening in HPV Vaccinated Women - a Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTampere UniversityRan2014 to 2025Enrolled6,958ConditionsCervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2/3ArmsCytological screening in A1 and A3
NCT04755517 naenrolling by invitationnot on this map

Effectiveness of Cervical Screening in Unvaccinated, Herd Effect Protected Women - A Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTampere University HospitalRan2020 to 2025Enrolled14,000ConditionsCervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2/3, Adenocarcinoma in SituArmsFrequent information of cytological/ HPV DNA screening results
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The effects of human papillomavirus vaccination in Japan.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Moral dilemma(s) in human papillomavirus vaccination - revisiting the role of the herd effect.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Penelope GrayFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9065-4734
Hanna KannDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2014-5437
Ville N PimenoffDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tiina ErikssonDepartment of Research and Development, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Tapio LuostarinenFinnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3231-8550
Simopekka VänskäDepartment of Infectious Disease Control and Vaccination, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5677-721X
Heljä-Marja SurcelFaculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Helena FaustDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Joakim DillnerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8588-6506
Matti LehtinenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEFinnish Cancer Registry · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIGerman Cancer Research Center · DEOulu University Hospital · FITampere University · FITampere University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer elimination through human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programs requires the attainment of herd effect. Due to its uniquely high basic reproduction number, the vaccination coverage required to achieve herd effect against HPV type 16 exceeds what is attainable in most populations. We have compared how gender-neutral and girls-only vaccination strategies create herd effect against HPV16 under moderate vaccination coverage achieved in a population-based, community-randomized trial. METHODS AND

findingsIn 2007-2010, the 1992-1995 birth cohorts of 33 Finnish communities were randomized to receive gender-neutral HPV vaccination (Arm A), girls-only HPV vaccination (Arm B), or no HPV vaccination (Arm C) (11 communities per trial arm). HPV16/18/31/33/35/45 seroprevalence differences between the pre-vaccination era (2005-2010) and post-vaccination era (2011-2016) were compared between all 8,022 unvaccinated women <23 years old and resident in the 33 communities during 2005-2016 (2,657, 2,691, and 2,674 in Arms A, B, and C, respectively). Post- versus pre-vaccination-era HPV seroprevalence ratios (PRs) were compared by arm. Possible outcome misclassification was quantified via probabilistic bias analysis. An HPV16 and HPV18 seroprevalence reduction was observed post-vaccination in the gender-neutral vaccination arm in the entire study population (PR16 = 0.64, 95% CI 0.10-0.85; PR18 = 0.72, 95% CI 0.22-0.96) and for HPV16 also in the herpes simplex virus type 2 seropositive core group (PR16 = 0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.81). Observed reductions in HPV31/33/35/45 seroprevalence (PR31/33/35/45 = 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.97) were replicated in Arm C (PR31/33/35/45 = 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90).

conclusionsIn this study we only observed herd effect against HPV16/18 after gender-neutral vaccination with moderate vaccination coverage. With only moderate vaccination coverage, a gender-neutral vaccination strategy can facilitate the control of even HPV16. Our findings may have limited transportability to other vaccination coverage levels.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00534638, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00534638.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusAntibodies, ViralImmunity, HerdImmunogenicity, VaccinePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFinlandHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansAntibodies, ViralPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34097688
PMCPMC8216524
OpenAlexW3172712910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.