Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34097638›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Determinants of Catalan public primary care professionals' intention to use digital clinical consultations (eConsulta) in the post-COVID-19 context: optical illusion or permanent transformation?

Francesc Saigí-Rubió, Josep Vidal-Alaball, Joan Torrent-Sellens, Ana Jiménez-Zarco, Francesc López Segui, Marta Carrasco Hernandez, Xavier Alzaga Reig, Josep Maria Bonet Simó, Mercedes Abizanda González, Jordi Piera-Jimenez and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Promoting telemedicine in Latin America in light of COVID-19.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francesc Saigí-RubióUniversitat Oberta de Catalunya, Faculty of Health Sciences, Barcelona, ES.
Josep Vidal-AlaballHealth Promotion in Rural Areas Research Group, Gerencia Territorial de la Catalunya Central, Institut Catala de la Salut, Carrer Pica d'Estats, 36,, Sant Fruitos de Bages, ES.
Joan Torrent-SellensInterdisciplinary Research Group on ICTs, Barcelona,, ES.
Ana Jiménez-ZarcoInterdisciplinary Research Group on ICTs, Barcelona,, ES.
Francesc López SeguiCentre de Recerca en Economia i Salut, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, ES.
Marta Carrasco HernandezHealth Department, Catalan Ministry of Health, Barcelona, ES.
Xavier Alzaga ReigHealth Department, Catalan Ministry of Health, Barcelona, ES.
Josep Maria Bonet SimóNorthern Metropolitan Primary Care Directorate, Institut Català de la Salut, Badalona, ES.
Mercedes Abizanda GonzálezHealth Department, eHealth Unit, Barcelona, ES.
Jordi Piera-JimenezDigitalization for the Sustainability of the Healthcare System, Sistema de Salut de Catalunya, Barcelona, ES.
Oscar SolansHealth Department, eHealth Unit, Barcelona, ES.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has become a necessary component of clinical practice for the purpose of providing safer patient care, and it has been used to support the healthcare needs of COVID-19 patients and routine primary care patients alike. However, this change has not been fully consolidated.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to analyse the determinants of healthcare professionals' intention to use the eConsulta digital clinical consultations tool in the post-COVID-19 context.

methodsA literature review of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) allowed us to construct a theoretical model and establish a set of hypotheses derived from it about the influence that a variety of different factors relating to both healthcare professionals and the institutions where they work had on those professionals' intention to use eConsulta. In order to confirm the proposed model, a mixed qualitative and quantitative methodology was used, and a questionnaire was designed to serve as the data collection instrument. The data were analysed using univariate and bivariate analysis techniques. To confirm the theoretical model, exploratory factor analysis and binary logistic regression were applied.

resultsThe most important variables were those referring to perceived benefits (B=2.408) and the type of use that individuals habitually made of eConsulta (B=0.715). Environmental pressure (B=0.678), experience of technology (B=0.542), gender (B=0.639) and the degree of eConsulta implementation (B=0.266) were other variables influencing the intention to use the tool in the post-COVID-19 context. When replicating the previous analysis by professional group, experience of technology and gender in the physician group, and experience of the tool's use and the centre where a professional works in the nurse group, were found to be of considerable importance.

conclusionsThe implementation and use of eConsulta had increased significantly as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the majority of the healthcare professionals were satisfied with its use in practice and planned to incorporate it into their practices in the post-COVID-19 context. Perceived benefits and environmental pressure were determining factors in the attitude towards and intention to use eConsulta. CLINICALTRIAL:

Identifiers

PMID34097638
PMCPMC8386368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.