ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2021
Clinical Inflection Point Detection on the Basis of EHR Data to Identify Clinical Trial-Ready Patients With Cancer.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Trial Notifications Triggered by Artificial Intelligence-Detected Cancer Progression: A Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Application of artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis.BMC medical genomics · 2026Review
- AI for clinical trials in oncology.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in clinical trial participant recruitment and retention: A scoping review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- Enabling Just-in-Time Clinical Oncology Analysis With Large Language Models: Feasibility and Validation Study Using Unstructured Synthetic Data.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Development and validation of hybrid machine learning approach for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a SEER-based population study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Implementation of a rule-based algorithm to find patients eligible for cancer clinical trials.JAMIA open · 2024Article
- Shareable artificial intelligence to extract cancer outcomes from electronic health records for precision oncology research.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence for optimizing recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Review
- Identifying Oncology Clinical Trial Candidates Using Artificial Intelligence Predictions of Treatment Change: A Pilot Implementation Study.JCO precision oncology · 2024Article
- Integration of artificial intelligence in lung cancer: Rise of the machine.Cell reports. Medicine · 2023Review
- A scoping review of natural language processing of radiology reports in breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo inform precision oncology, methods are needed to use electronic health records (EHRs) to identify patients with cancer who are experiencing clinical inflection points, consistent with worsening prognosis or a high propensity to change treatment, at specific time points. Such patients might benefit from real-time screening for clinical trials.
methodsUsing serial unstructured imaging reports for patients with solid tumors or lymphoma participating in a single-institution precision medicine study, we trained a deep neural network natural language processing (NLP) model to dynamically predict patients' prognoses and propensity to start new palliative-intent systemic therapy within 30 days. Model performance was evaluated using Harrell's c-index (for prognosis) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC; for new treatment and new clinical trial enrollment). Associations between model outputs and manual annotations of cancer progression were also evaluated using the AUC.
resultsA deep NLP model was trained and evaluated using 302,688 imaging reports for 16,780 patients. In a held-out test set of 34,770 reports for 1,952 additional patients, the model predicted survival with a c-index of 0.76 and initiation of new treatment with an AUC of 0.77. Model-generated prognostic scores were associated with annotation of cancer progression on the basis of manual EHR review (n = 1,488 reports for 110 patients with lung or colorectal cancer) with an AUC of 0.78, and predictions of new treatment were associated with annotation of cancer progression on the basis of manual EHR review with an AUC of 0.84.
conclusionTraining a deep NLP model to identify clinical inflection points among patients with cancer is feasible. This approach could identify patients who may benefit from real-time targeted clinical trial screening interventions at health system scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.