Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34097227›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2022

Impact of a pharmacist driven anticoagulation reversal program at a large academic medical center.

Gabrielle L Procopio, Ruchi Patel Jain, Danielle M Tompkins, Javier Martin Perez, Keri Bicking

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabrielle L ProcopioDepartment of Pharmacy, Hackensack University Medical Center, 30 Prospect Ave, Hackensack, NJ, 07601, USA. Gabrielle.Procopio@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6592-4728
Ruchi Patel JainDepartment of Pharmacy, Hackensack University Medical Center, 30 Prospect Ave, Hackensack, NJ, 07601, USA.
Danielle M TompkinsDepartment of Pharmacy, Hackensack University Medical Center, 30 Prospect Ave, Hackensack, NJ, 07601, USA.
Javier Martin PerezDepartment of Surgery, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, 07601, USA.
Keri BickingDepartment of Pharmacy, Hackensack University Medical Center, 30 Prospect Ave, Hackensack, NJ, 07601, USA.
Hackensack University Medical Center · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In major/life-threatening bleeding, administration of timely and appropriate reversal agents is imperative to reduce morbidity and mortality. Due to complexities associated with the use of reversal agents, a clinical pharmacist-driven anticoagulation reversal program (ARP) was developed. The goal of this program was to ensure appropriateness of reversal agents based on the clinical scenario, optimize selection and avoid unintended consequences. This study describes the impact of a pharmacist-driven anticoagulation program on patient outcomes and cost. A single center retrospective chart review of adult patients whom the ARP was consulted from October 2018 to January 2020 was performed. Patients were included in the efficacy analysis if they were > 18 years of age and presented with acute bleeding. Patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis if the recommended reversal agent was not administered, if a repeat head CT was not available for patients who presented with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), or if the patient was not bleeding. All patients were included in the economic evaluation. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who achieved effective hemostasis within 24 h of anticoagulation reversal. Secondary outcomes include incidence of thromboembolic events, in-hospital mortality, and cost avoidance. One hundred twenty-one patients were evaluated by the ARP with 92 patients included in the efficacy analysis. The primary sites of bleeding were ICH in 46% and gastrointestinal (GI) in 29%. Hemostasis was achieved in 84% of patients. Thrombotic events occurred in 7.4% of patients and in-hospital mortality was 26.4%. Total cost avoidance was $1,005,871.78. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-driven ARP on clinical and economic outcomes. Implementation of a pharmacist-driven ARP was associated with favorable outcomes and cost savings.

Indexed as

Anticoagulation ReversalPharmacistsAcademic Medical CentersAdultAnticoagulantsBlood Coagulation FactorsFactor XaFactor Xa InhibitorsHumansRetrospective StudiesAnticoagulantsBlood Coagulation FactorsFactor XaFactor Xa Inhibitors4F-PCCAndexanet alfaAnticoagulation reversalCritical careEmergency medicine

Identifiers

PMID34097227
OpenAlexW3169677409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.